Talk:Nothing (Meshuggah album)

Untitled

 * The meaning of the word stengah would be good to know. Whisky and soda? It seems a little out of character for meshuggah. Se tengah is one half, which is a little better.
 * Stengah means syringe. 3H 18:20, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Original recorded with custom Nevborn 7-strings
I saw it mentioned in a review somewhere, and I checked here after looking thoroughly through both versions of the album that I have, and checked the band's website. I checked here, and attempted to find a source to prove it. I couldn't find the two resources I checked first and a great deal of searching the band's forums. This can cause a lot of problems with pretty much any listener dealing with the album. I can't think of any other sources anywhere near as viable as those three, but maybe I missed something, and maybe there's something I didn't think of. But given the issues the article has already caused, that one claim really needs to be proved or refuted. Factual inaccuracy spreads to some degree or another.

What I did find on the forums however was an interview with Tomas Haake in which he said "...we did a few mistakes in the past, as most bands have, like with the 'Chaosphere' album, we accepted the SLAYER tour so we had to rush the recording and the production suffered from it, I think. And the same thing for the 'Nothing' album. We would have needed at least another three months for that album and when we had already gone into the studio for the recording, we got the offer to play Ozzfest and we accepted. But the album suffered from it, I think, especially production-wise. We had to rush it real bad. We just didn't have any time for anything, not to even reflect on what we were doing. We recorded the vocals in like seven days and for 'Chaosphere'." - http://www.tandjent.com/meshforum/viewtopic.php?t=12817

So that's all I could really find out. Let's see if there's more to find.

Speedemon86 08:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, according to these guys at Meshuggah's forum, Nothing showcased the 8 strings:
 * http://www.tandjent.com/meshforum/viewtopic.php?t=16229&highlight=nevborn+ibanez+++string
 * They discuss it like it's a given fact, and even have it down to the exact tunings. I think we should trust them. 69.37.75.171 23:47, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

7-string Nevborns were used, the 8s weren't done back then. This thread states this, with questions answered by Fredrik Thordendal. http://www.tandjent.com/meshforum/viewtopic.php?t=3441 80.202.252.56 08:53, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

This article states that "due to their custom Nevborn [8-string] guitars not yet being ready", so they used detuned 7-string guitars. However, later in the article, in the re-master section, it states the 7-string guitars were used because the 8-string guitars "suffered from bad intonation and became detuned between each recording." Fact check? Theres two different reasons stated in the article for the reason they used 7-string guitars, and its inconsistent and needs to be fixed. I don't know which is correct and don't have the time to research it at the moment or else I would fix it myself :P 74.199.14.43 (talk) 18:52, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

R3tex 3:09, 19 January (UTC) OK... for all the people that are confused about the 7/8 string thing and put their best guesses on this page. Fredrik himself has the info (about halfway down the page): http://www.tandjent.com/meshforum/viewtopic.php?t=3073&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=line++pod+pro&start=20

Fair use rationale for Image:Meshuggah-Nothing.jpg
Image:Meshuggah-Nothing.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Meshuggah-Nothing.jpg
Image:Meshuggah-Nothing.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Track errors?
My version of the original Nothing has some overlay errors, such as the first second or two of Straws Pulled At Random on Organic Shadows, the previous track. My version displays the correct times and correlates with the tracklisting for the original on here. Should this be noted, and has anyone else experienced this? This doesn't appear on my copy of the reissue. 88.107.64.164 (talk) 20:06, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Meshuggah - Straws Pulled At Random.ogg
The image File:Meshuggah - Straws Pulled At Random.ogg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --07:41, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:55, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Meshuggah-nothing-16.jpg