Talk:Nova Spivack

Verification & sources
Most statements have been verified and rewritten for clarity. I kindly request feedback; those who want even more references either help fix the article or suggest revisions. ---hthth (talk) 04:25, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Potential Bias
A cursory google search indicates that User:Hthth is one of two "power users" of Spivack's website Twine who have "a lot of direct discourse with Nova." Sounds like a conflict of interest to me... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Travishing (talk • contribs) 00:39, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I used Twine in the past, although the quoted exaggerates. I can add that his work is within my field of study. The article is mostly a chronological list of his work; facts are easily verified. A second opinion is good; would you have a look and tell me if there's something to improve, or make edits yourself? ---hthth (talk) 12:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Umm
So is it pretty common these days to put self-promoting resumes up on wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.166.8.157 (talk) 20:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know. Where did you find one? I hope you've gone ahead and fixed any self-promoting aspects of that article. You know, explain your claims and then improve upon any lacking aspects. ---hthth (talk) 08:08, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I see there've been some changes since I read it over last time. Won't be as melodramatic in wording as above commenter, but it's in need of some cleanup. ---hthth (talk) 08:15, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 01:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC)