Talk:Novial alphabet

Removal of content
User:Onel5969, you removed content from the page. Do you dare to explain why? 77.179.7.62 (talk) 14:13, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If you continue to vandalize this page, you might be blocked from editing. This page is a content fork.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:54, 8 June 2017 (UTC)


 * User:Onel5969, Content forking is not forbidden, nor did you prove it is one. 77.179.7.62 (talk) 17:02, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Onel5969 lied about the existence of the content in the target article of the redirect he inserted. 77.179.7.62 (talk) 17:05, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

User:PRehse did remove content from the English Wikipedia. . 77.179.95.147 (talk) 20:03, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Lectonar did remove content from the English Wikipedia and didn't dare to explain why. 

User:Lectonar, would you dare to explain why you removed content from the English Wikipedia? 77.179.25.232 (talk) 20:51, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * So, no answer? 77.179.25.232 (talk) 21:09, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Page protection 2017-06-08 20:33
User:Lectonar did protect the redirect that he himself inserted. Edit comment contains "Protected "Novial alphabet": Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content "

User:Lectonar, what information you regard as "Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content"? 77.179.25.232 (talk) 20:41, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I reverted to the last stable version before you changed it; there is no consensus to create the content fork, so the onus is on you, oh thee of the many IPs, to gather that consensus before creating the content fork again again. Care to register an account? Makes it much easier for everyone involved. Lectonar (talk) 20:45, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * User:Lectonar, "before you changed it" - but why? You removed content. Where is the policy that allows your content removal? 77.179.25.232 (talk) 20:47, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * You are no newbie, so you know of course that the content is not removed...don't play semantic games. Lectonar (talk) 20:48, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Lectonar, would you dare to answer the question: what information you regard as "Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content"? 77.179.25.232 (talk) 20:50, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Would you try and get consensus for creating the content fork? Make an effort, hmmm? Lectonar (talk) 20:51, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * That is not the question here. You claimed "Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content". 77.179.25.232 (talk) 20:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually it is...semi-protected for edit warring now. Happy? Lectonar (talk) 20:53, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * User:Lectonar, we conlang editors are happy when we can work on the Novial alphabet article. But you stop our contributions. 77.179.25.232 (talk) 21:14, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Page protection 2017-06-08 20:55
User:Lectonar protected the page with the edit summary Protected "Novial alphabet": Edit warring / content dispute , while he himself was involved in the edit warring. Also he protected it only for some users ("Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access"), further supporting the impression he has a one sided position. 77.179.25.232 (talk) 21:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Article develpment once again stopped by an admin
In April it was stopped, now we could improve the article a bit,, but again the development was stopped. While Esperanto orthography has a full article, and for English there is English orthography, even a separate article for English alphabet, one for Standard written English, even for individual words e.g. Spelling of disc, for Novial there is no single article dedicated to writing the language.

The blockers and reverters don't seem to have specific knowledge of the language and repeatedly lie about their reasons for their actions. 77.179.25.232 (talk) 21:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)