Talk:Now You See Me 2

Requested move

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 01:08, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Now You See Me: The Second Act → Now You See Me: Now You Don't – This sequel will be titled Now You See Me: Now You Don't. It will not be titled Now You See Me: The Second Act. Here is the supporting reference for that information. Spidey 104  18:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I would deny this if I could. One of the sources on the main article includes Mark Ruffalo, one of the main characters, posting on his official Facebook with a paper named Now You See Me: The Second Act. Verify for yourself. Callmemirela  ( talk ) 20:01, 26 November 2014 (UTC)


 * It's just been announce that Now You See Me: The Second Act is the new title, even Mark Ruffalo posted it to his with an official title card from the film. https://www.facebook.com/MarkRuffalo/photos/a.1460292930871638.1073741828.1457745994459665/1572887852945478/?type=1 http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/mark-ruffalo-reveals-now-you-see-me-2-title-948 LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:26, 26 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Morgan Freeman
Morgan Freeman is due to appear in the movie, as stated by MANY articles (I am happy to list many articles). Plus, the source given to remove him from the cast list does not confirm if he is not in the film. It is possibly implied, but it is not confirmed. Callmemirela ( talk ) 22:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Requested move 20 November 2015

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: move. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:11, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Now You See Me: The Second Act → Now You See Me 2 – Move per WP:COMMONNAME. A search of Now You See Me 2 and Now You See Me: The Second Act on YouTube give 15,400,000 and 260,000 results respectively. On Google, the numbers are 1,820,000,000 and 413,000,000 results respectively. The official trailer (YouTube) and iMDb also refer to the film as Now You See Me 2. Numerous other reliable sources include, Digital Trends, Mashable. I'm done. :) QEDK  ♠  T  ♥  C  20:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Support as an uncontroversial move since the film is now officially titled Now You See Me 2. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 21:07, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Support. Callmemirela  🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  22:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Critical Response
Would anyone be willing to add some negative-leaning reviews to this section for some balance? Most all the reviews cited are on the positive side, despite the film having a very mixed critical reception.--Algernon333 (talk) 16:08, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright plog page
How is the plot copyrighted? -- Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! •  Contributions ) 17:59, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Its not and unless Callmemirela provides a source for the so called copyright infringement, I have undone the removal of the plot section.-- Dcheagle   &bull; talk &bull; contribs 20:56, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * This is the one I have at the moment. I don't know when the plot was added on that website. Callmemirela  🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  21:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I think they might appropriated it from Wikipedia as it looks like a pirating website. -- Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! •  Contributions ) 19:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)