Talk:Now and Then (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy move to "Now and Then (film)". --Gh87 05:24, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Requested move
Now and Then (1995 film) → Now and Then (film) — There should be at least two articles about two films with the same name but in different dates; I would suggest this article at my request, unless we find more articles titled "Now and Then (???? film)" Gh87 20:49, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Survey

 * ''Add  * Support   or   * Oppose   on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~.


 * Support- Now and Then shows only one film. -Patstuarttalk 14:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Support- Uncontroversial. Just do it.  --Serge 00:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Support - this could have just been done - it did not need to go to RM. -- Beardo 04:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Discussion

 * ''Add any additional comments:
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Fair use rationale for Image:NOW and THEN 3.jpg
Image:NOW and THEN 3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Dear Anonymous Page Editors
Do NOT point out mistakes on a page FIX them this is a encyclopedia not a blog. Even if you are correct which you were you need to fix the mistake if you do not know how to then please write a message on the discussion page and someone will come along eventually and fix it --Pdesil (talk) 08:48, 18 April 2010 (UTC)