Talk:Nozomi (spacecraft)

Comment
Nozomi is also a Japanese female name. Should this be added to the article? 85.164.76.159 17:09, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure. Hope is also an English female name, but if an American spacecraft was named Hope we probably wouldn't mention the female name. -- Curps 17:59, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

U. Tokyo involvement?
The article states: It was constructed by the Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, University of Tokyo At that time, ISAS was not part of U Tokyo anymore. Was there a major involvement of U Tokyo? --Fukumoto 15:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Move?

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:55, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Nozomi (probe) → Nozomi probe — for consistency, per Suisei probe (PLANET-A) – 86.162.163.210 (talk) 22:37, 29 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose as its name is "Nozomi", so "Nozomi (probe)" is the most accurate. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WikiProject Japan ! 02:38, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose. As above, the name appears to be "Nozomi", not "Nozomi probe". --DAJF (talk) 23:03, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose. I proposed this move, but since then Suisei probe has moved to Suisei (probe), and Akatsuki (Planet-C) is about to move to Akatsuki (probe) - see Talk:Akatsuki (Planet-C). 86.147.206.66 (talk) 17:48, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Current status - fixed
Article says it is still active. Can we add : how much fuel is left, what communications are working, and when it next approaches Mars ? Rod57 (talk) 09:30, 9 December 2010 (UTC)


 * The operation was terminated by sending the cease command on December 31, 2003. (The communication was lost before that already.)  --Fukumoto (talk) 15:58, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Wrong orbit - fixed
The article says that this spacecraft is orbiting the sun, but the summary box says it's a satellite of Mars. Greg (talk) 06:24, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Summary box now says heliocentric. Could add period. - Rod57 (talk) 08:11, 10 May 2020 (UTC)