Talk:NuComm International/Archive 1

Company Renamed
It appears this company switching over to the name Techcomm, for reasons I don't really know. What is the best way about handling this change? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.231.103.36 (talk) 01:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

It's changing to Transcom, for reasons listed in the article. Photonicsguy (talk) 16:20, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Advertisement
It's not an advertisement, it's a brief summary of the company history, and its locations. What else would you like?

Fr0 22:56, 16 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Phrases such as "this philosophy has helped drive NuComm to a leadership position" amd "consistently deliver breakthrough performance for its clients" show bias towards the company. Please review Wikipedia's Neutral point of view policy and re-word these and other non-neutral statements in the article. If you need assistance doing so, let me know and I can help make some changes during the next week that would better align this article with policy. --AbsolutDan (talk) 03:32, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

It's a good company, and I can vouche for it because I work there. I don't care to get them more business, and you are free to edit all you like. :) Fr0 00:55, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok I've wikified and trimmed the article some, leaving as much neutral point of view content as I could. --AbsolutDan (talk) 16:28, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Hey I added their Executive Team and another link to a NuComm App. Acid0057 06:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Hey, nice addition. Just wondering if we really need the previous offices. Doesn't really seem necessary. Comments? Fr0 07:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Nah I think it's neat to see the former sites that were NuComm. Acid0057 03:47, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Cleanup
This article was in awful shape - more advertisement than anything else. I've trimmed down as much as I can at the moment, especially fluff that didn't have citations. There's still a couple questionable sections, especially in the history section. Feel free to clean further. At least now though I think we can remove the spam tag. Future editors: please remember to write this article in a neutral point of view using citations whenever possible. Thanks --AbsolutDan (talk) 14:02, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Sounds like you have a personal issue with transcom/nucomm absolutdan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.191.69.149 (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)