Talk:Nuance

(...Arguable humor...)
... about the nuances of thinking and communicating about ''either of two matters:)   I think the actual definition of nuance is subject to more nuance than the article suggests.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.73.40.95 (talk) 18:52, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) nuance, an aspect of (either) sensation, thought, meaning, communication, law, and causality,   and/or
 * 2) for that matter, also  the difficulties of thinking thru, or discussing, any successes achieved from considering such things. --JerzyA (talk) 11:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Gosh, did i miss a nuance of either
 * "nuance" or
 * Nuance, or (for that matter, even...)
 * nuances in general?
 * --JerzyA (talk) 11:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

(Vaugeness)
Could this article be any more vague? I came here after seeing this in the Asperger article and predictably, I am more confused than before. 98.145.211.102 (talk) 16:50, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Despite my (however belated) participation in the merriment above, i acknowledge your question is presumably not just the most distasteful part of said merriment, but rather a serious question: so, in case your question was not simply another of colleagues' (and my own) grotesque parodies of this semantically and intellectually difficult term:
 * Nuance is occasionally used to mean "insinuation", which I for one think of mostly as insults (or perhaps in some circles, hidden meanings used
 * merely ostentatiously, and/or
 * to deliver insults, so subtly that those insulted can be mocked in the eyes of a clique, either
 * openly, as "paranoid", or
 * by indirection (if the target is thought to be so insecure about their own actual merit as to likely construe insults from others who disparage -- or even appear to take note of -- an arguable cause for disapproval).
 * --JerzyA (talk) 11:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)