Talk:Nuclear Restoration Services

Merge proposal
I think we should consider merging this article into Magnox Ltd, renaming it to Nuclear Restoration Services Ltd. The Magnox article is relatively short and has much higher SEO rankings than this new one; furthermore, it already covers the previous 5 names this legal company has had. Separating the NRS article could mislead readers into thinking NRS Ltd and Magnox Ltd are legally different - that this would be the case is why the Magnox Ltd article was not originally moved, but in fact a new company was not created. It is a fundamental part of NRS's history that it was previously Magnox Ltd, and I cannot find a precedent for having different names of the same legal company under different articles. See https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/02264251 for more. Xii Xii 16:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Support. This is widely described as a "rebrand" by RS, not a fundamentally new entity. Although many sources are simply reprinting a press release there's also nothing to suggest it's been interpreted otherwise.  Triptothecottage (talk) 00:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Support the idea of a merge, but think that the (current) title Nuclear Restoration Services is better (no need for the 'Ltd'), as it is more concise and better fits the idea of best known as when talking about a company. For example, in conversation, one wouldn't use the 'Ltd'. Klbrain (talk) 08:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)