Talk:Nuclear apartheid

Deletion?
There was an article requested on this subject and quite frankly there should have been one a long time ago. This term is becoming more mainstream and is used frequently by the media and world leaders. I'd be curious to hear someone's reason why this should be deleted, as the term is almost certainly going to become more and more common.


 * The only source provided only states that this term has been used once. That is not even close to being enough to establish the term's notability. NOTE: We are not discussing the notability of the concept; rather that of the term. --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 01:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


 * A Google search yields 9000 hits, many on reputable pubications (Foreign Affairs, etc.). Keep. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.255.240.137 (talk) 13:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


 * You can find the term used in reference to Iran, India, and Pakistan in just the first couple pages of a google search. It can be found on pages belonging to CNN and BBC. It is referenced in at least two books on the first four pages of the search.

Additional sources?
I'm not sure why this article needs any additional sources considering how basic it is. What's the rationale? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.255.142.33 (talk) 16:56, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I've added quite a few sources and more content, so I'm going to delete the template for additional sources. If anyone has a problem with that, please explain and give suggestions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthomure (talk • contribs) 17:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)