Talk:Nuclear power/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: JackFromReedsburg (talk · contribs) 17:33, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello! I will be reviewing this article soon. Expect comments in the next few days. JackFromReedsburg (talk &#124; contribs) 17:33, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

General comments

 * This should not be in the lead: "This article mostly deals with nuclear fission power for electricity generation."


 * No citations in lead, which is good because all of the information is in the article
 * Yes, this was intentional. All information in the lead is present in more detail and referenced in the article body. --Ita140188 (talk) 12:43, 17 April 2021 (UTC)


 * In the history section, I recommend moving the france graph to the gallery.
 * ✅ --Ita140188 (talk) 02:31, 17 April 2021 (UTC)


 * "Life cycle of nuclear fuel" section is not sourced.
 * ✅ rewrote partially and added sources --Ita140188 (talk) 12:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC)


 * It might be useful to have a short summary on nuclear waste in its section (before going into the specific types), although not required
 * ✅ I tried to give a brief intro. Let me know if it is enough. --Ita140188 (talk) 01:43, 20 April 2021 (UTC)


 * "Nuclear decommissioning" is also unsourced.
 * ✅ rewrote and added sources --Ita140188 (talk) 03:22, 19 April 2021 (UTC)


 * "Use in space" is unsourced.
 * ✅ rewrote partially and added source --Ita140188 (talk) 02:39, 17 April 2021 (UTC)


 * All images are properly licenced.

Discussion

 * Article has several issues (including referencing) that need to be fixed. I will put this on hold for now. --JackFromReedsburg (talk &#124; contribs) 15:43, 15 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you! I will address the comments in the coming days. --Ita140188 (talk) 16:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)


 * I tried to address all the comments. Please let me know if there are any other areas that can be improved. Thanks! --Ita140188 (talk) 01:45, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for fixing the issues. I don't see anything preventing this from becoming a GA, so I will be promoting it. (I changed my name, so hopefully the bots don't get annoyed) JackFromWisconsin (talk &#124; contribs) 01:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Great! Thank you for the review! --Ita140188 (talk) 01:47, 21 April 2021 (UTC)