Talk:Nuclear power phase-out/to do


 * Anti-nuclear organizations make the claim phase-outs were on the rise while pro-nuclear organizations claim nuclear energy was booming. IMO, this is one of the most important issues that the article has to deal with. A good place for this is the introduction. Some (few) statistics are at (World Nuclear Power Statistics 2004 - ). An illustrative graph could be a good idea.


 * The country section needs to be expanded. Especially the following countries (along with possible references):
 * Asia:


 * 1) China
 * 2) India ,
 * 3) Iran
 * 4) South Korea, Kazakhstan , Japan
 * 5) Pakistan, , (Section I History),(Compare also Khan Affair)
 * Europe:


 * 1) France
 * 2) Russia
 * 3) Great Britain
 * 4) Ukraine
 * 5) Norway, Denmark, Greece, Poland
 * 6) Czech Republic
 * 7) Romania
 * Americas


 * 1) US
 * 2) Canada, Mexico, Argentina, Brazil
 * Africa


 * 1) South Africa, (Koeberg station)


 * The discussion section could be merged with nuclear energy and expanded, e.g. with An analysis of Bernard Cohen's figures.


 * A further argument for a phase-out could be workstations. The German Minister Jürgen Trittin claims more new jobs had been created by renewable energy than could have been by nuclear energy.


 * The references need to be put at the end.


 * A section at the end needs to discuss future perspectives for phase-outs/nuclear energy. (e.g.


 * Four Corners, a Australian Broadcasting Corporation series, had a programme on contrasting debates about nuclear energy in Sweden and Australia. "Who's Afraid of Nuclear Power?".