Talk:Nuclear weapons convention

Original Research
Please explain (give rational) for this article/lemma; this is very much in the area of No original research. I say this because the German article has similar problems. If the so-called "Nuclear Weapons Convention" is an official, formally run program, by the UN, that would be a good reason. However, a "proposed multilateral treaty..." is not original research, or in the words of Wikipedia, does not publish original thought (see link above). On-going UN proposals and ideas are not original research. It is perfectly fine to have articles on NTP, CTBT, etc.. Furthermore: Multiple passages that mention ~2007 etc., so this is either history or should be updated. This is just one feedback. KR

17387349L8764 (talk) 19:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)