Talk:Numark Pro TT-2

Gentlemen,

the purpose of creating the Numark Pro TT-2 Turntable page was just a followup from the Numark (DJ Equipment) page that features pages extremely similar to the one I created, re: TT1650 and PT01. I researched the product, and provided a balanced viewpoint, including both praise and accolades as WELL as some downside. I cited my references correctly, and presented an article that tries to fall in the encyclopedic guideline grey area for articles. I will try to rephrase my wording to make it even more impartial.

thanks for your time,

Ckidd3987 (talk) 01:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Hmm. I see that you've removed some of the most problematic phrasing and added some negative points, so I won't stand behind my "blatant advertising" tag anymore.  (Mostly because of the "blatant" part, mind you.)
 * That said, I'm concerned about the notability of individual turntable models. Can you provide some reliable sources independent of Numark itself that discuss this model (or the other two you mention) in-depth?  The only source I can see on any of them that isn't from Numark itself is the one you've provided for the negative reviews of this turntable, and that seems to be user-generated content, which is usually frowned upon.   Anturiaethwr  Talk  02:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Absolutely. I had some other obligations earlier today that prevented me from researching further, but I'll find more corroborating references that may help on the 'notability' issue. I felt as there were pages for six or eight other products, I would put together a page for this one. As a first time poster, I read the guidelines but elaborated my position incorrectly, I look forward to learning the craft as I contribute more. Thanks for keeping wikipedia free of garbage.

Ckidd3987 (talk) 09:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)