Talk:Nuno sa punso

Needs futher cleaning up, etc.
This article needs futher cleaning up, a better style, better Englisn, more sources (there aren't any!), etc.--Francisco Valverde 19:52, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Termite mounds vs. Anthill
I think they are believed to reside in termite mounds rather than anthills.

always thought they lived by trees. nice article though. brought back childhood memories. Traderjoe56

Tagged as not representing worldwide view
I don't think this tag is necessary, as the article explains at the beginning that is is a Philippine myth. What do others think? Misspenny 21:46, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Has anyone ever met someone with Nuno as a first name?
This has become a fairly common name in Portugal? Nortaak 22:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Sources???
This seriously needs to be sourced and referenced.  Dei zio  talk 02:34, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Sightings
We should know if there are any sightings, if so, add theam to the article.--Sonicobbsessed (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Article's whacked
The article presumes that nunos are real. Which, they are not! "Treat them with respect." What's with that? They don't exist. It's like presuming that the Olympian Gods are real too. Is there any tag for that? --  Felipe   Aira  12:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You might consider editing it so it will be less "in-universe"-- Lenticel ( talk ) 04:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

It's not appropriate to critique myths as being in-universe as if they were simply fiction. The world of myths and the world of fantasy/science fiction are not simply the same thing. This article is very clear about describing a character in a mythology. There is nothing in-universe about that. I've removed the tag. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marpeck (talk • contribs) 13:46, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Merger proposal
Nuno and Nuno sa Punso are duplicates. Pfhreak (talk) 17:29, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Did someone get carried away with copy and pasting? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.49.54.43 (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

"Multiple Issues" tagged
Though there's some interesting and possibly valid information here, it's not cited, and seems to be written as though the subject is a scientifically-documented phenomena rather then a cultural/spiritual belief.--Xiaphias (talk) 22:29, 16 April 2010 (UTC) The article doesn't report on studies, it doesn't list an hypothesis, it doesn't give an area of scientific concern. It simply describes a character in a mythology as if that character belongs there, which it does. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marpeck (talk • contribs) 13:48, 17 July 2010 (UTC)