Talk:Nurofen

Merge suggestion
Merge. The two articles are describing a product with the same brand name. Although it's a different formulation (i.e. contains different drugs), the articles should be merged, much like the NyQuil article. Fuzzform (talk) 23:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Don't merge, but if you do, please ensure all links to Nurofen Plus go to the correct subsection with a re-direct or exhaustive code implementation. I think this may differ from NyQuil as it is not sold un-subtitled, (i.e., its different products are each sold with appropriate subtitles), whereas an un-subtitled Nurofen is sold, which would make Nurofen Plus a different product from Nurofen rather than merely another member of the Nurofen family. I could be wrong. If I'm wrong about Nyquil, then there should be both a NyQuil (brand) and a NyQuil (product). Making Nurofen into Nurofen (product) and creating a Nurofen (brand) just to remove Nurofen Plus seems illogical. --Thecurran (talk) 02:55, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Blatant advert?
This article seems to be a blatant advert - Spam!! This article needs deleting. 78.32.143.113 (talk) 08:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Agreed, seems to be a blatant advert. Where's the side effects? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.181.5.185 (talk) 00:28, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

brought from the article
The citation does not appear to support the comment. What it does say didn't seem really notable anyway. Just that they didbn't find any in Ireland and don't sell the type of packs affected there either. Off2riorob (talk) 13:27, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

It was reported that packs of Nurofen Plus were also tampered with in Ireland on August 27. http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/republic-of-ireland/nurofen-plus-checks-in-ireland-16041926.html

POV
Words like "slick marketing practices" seem a bit inappropriate from a point of view aspect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.172.36.45 (talk) 04:02, 7 April 2014 (UTC)