Talk:Nuthatch/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Nuthatch/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

This article is very well written, well research, and quite interesting. I believe it meets the six aspects of the Good Article criteria, and can be listed.

✅ Prose Very well written, with a few minor issues that were easier to fix myself. Might want to go through an additional round of copyediting before a WP:FAC, to iron things out a bit more. But overall, the prose is very good.

✅ Factually accurate The article is sufficiently referenced with ample inline citations. The citations meet WP:RS. There are no issues here.

✅ Broad in coverage Covers all of the major aspects that an article about a biological organism (a genus in this case, not a species) should have; taxonomy, distribution/habitat, basic description of the organism, reproductive behavior, feeding, environmental issues.

✅ It is written from a neutral point of view.

✅ There are no major edit wars. Most of the editing was done by and. Good work!

✅ The images are useful, add to the article, and have appropriate copyright tags.

The article will be listed. Dr. Cash (talk) 21:17, 27 June 2008 (UTC)