Talk:Nyctibatrachus mewasinghi/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Grungaloo (talk · contribs) 23:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi - only a few comments on this one! Let me know once you've had a chance to review. grungaloo (talk) 23:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * See comments Issues addressed
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Sources check out, no copyvio.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Major aspects covered. Limited sources exist for this so good coverage of what's available.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Meets NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * No recent reverts or evidence of edit warring
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Appropriate images and captions.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * See comments Passed!

Comments

 * Could add a pushpin map but not necessary for GA.
 * Male/Female picture labels in speciesbox should be capitalized.
 * - "shows relationships among the three species". Since you just listed these 3 in the previous sentence I think you can make this definite.
 * - "and the underside is mainly off-white"
 * - the discs on the third finger and fourth toe...
 * , all done. AryKun (talk) 12:15, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'm happy to promote this. Congratulations on another great article and thanks for your work as always! grungaloo (talk) 15:58, 23 December 2023 (UTC)