Talk:Nydalen metro station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 21:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

This article, which is for a quite new railway station, is compliant with the requirements. Many of the references are in Norsk, but they appear to verify the claims. I'm therefore awarding GA-status.Pyrotec (talk) 19:53, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking the time to do the review. Arsenikk (talk)  20:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Couldn't this be collapsed? __meco (talk) 18:38, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Of course, but there is no point in doing so, unless there are sections with resolved comments. See Featured list candidates/List of Copenhagen Metro stations/archive1 for an example. -- Eisfbnore  ( talk ) 19:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)