Talk:Nylon-eating bacteria and creationism

August 2008
This article was created from material moved from the article Nylon-eating bacteria as result of an extended discussion on that article's talk page. Rusty Cashman (talk) 02:58, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Banners on intro
An editor added some banners claiming the intro provided insufficient context, and was unencyclopedic. I believe I have addressed those concerns. I would appreciate it if the editor that added the banners either agreed to their removal or provided specific comments any remaining problems. Thanks. Rusty Cashman (talk) 05:32, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * When I first saw the article, it wasn't readily understandable to the casual reader. It's been cleaned up quite a bit and explains its subject much better now, so sure, I agree that the tags are no longer necessary. It's not featured by a long shot, but it's not bad at all. Alinnisawest (talk) 14:35, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I made the mistake of thinking I could move the material over from nylon-eating bacteria in one edit and come back later to work on the intro. However, people seem quicker off the mark around here than they used to be. :) Rusty Cashman (talk) 17:08, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Intelligent Design
Added by beneath the article's last sentence:"^This is inconsitent with Wikipedia article Nylon-eating bacteria which states 'The P. aeruginosa strain' which the scientist's studied 'did not seem to use the same enzymes that had been utilized by the original Flavobacterium strain.' [ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.19.14.17 (talk • contribs) 20:15, 21 November 2009 (UTC) ]"—   Fourthords  &#124; =Λ= &#124; 15:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Characterization of talk.origins POTM
Hi Cyberpower. On a second reading I prefer your version to mine. The phrase "highly critical" at the beginning of the paragraph is sufficient to capture the tone of the t.o. cite. Garamond Lethe 15:28, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

poor choice of words
"critics of creationism and intelligent design" you mean..scientists, right ?181.14.199.130 (talk) 17:03, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * In addition to scientists, teachers, scholars, students, their parents, and even some religious figures also criticize creationism and intelligent design. So, no, it's actually an apt choice of words.--Mr Fink (talk) 17:11, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I also found the sentence loaded so have reworded it. — Paleo  Neonate  – 11:30, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There were various other WP:GEVAL and WP:YESPOV issues that I tried to address. — Paleo  Neonate  – 12:11, 8 September 2020 (UTC)