Talk:O.P. Garden

Bad redirect
User:Chainwit., O.P. Garden is an entirely different property, located at 13.72528°N, 100.51583°W, whereas O.P. Place is at 13.72444°N, 100.51556°W. Also, the only current incoming link to O.P. Garden is from O.P. Place, making this a bad self-redirect loop. I suggest tagging the redirect for speedy deletion as G7. --Paul_012 (talk) 21:46, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * According to ; yes, it is located at a different location. But, O.P. Garden ("the newer building") is more of an extension to the O.P. Place ("the historical building"), and is also a business run under the "O.P. Place" (as a brand). This may justify the redirect. On self-redirect loop, should it be fixed by adding a separated section for O.P. Garden in this article (given it's a subsidary thingies)? Plus, I'm quite optimistic that "O.P. Garden" may appear on other future articles citing the "O.P. Garden" (eg, Soi Charoen Krung 36; the location, or Bangkok Design Week; took place here). If you see it otherwise, please kindly let me know. --Chainwit. (talk) 22:05, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I'd actually previously been thinking a bit about this. It'd be best as its own article, but I haven't quite been able to find enough sources that would support a stand-alone article. The two are different buildings with separate histories, though, so I don't think it's right to cover both in the same article just because the current owners brand them under the same umbrella. Maybe a better solution would be to create an article on Soi 36 / Rue de Brest, which would also provide space to cover the other historic buildings there which don't yet have articles. Even without that, we could add mention of O.P. Garden under Bang Rak Subdistrict (since it already mentions Boonsong Lekagul's clinic), and point the redirect there. --Paul_012 (talk) 22:51, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Agreed. --Chainwit. (talk) 05:30, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I've added a mention and retargeted the redirect. Please keep in mind for future cases, though, that a redirect should be explained in at least some form at the target for it to be helpful for the reader. Otherwise, it'd fail the principle of least astonishment. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:14, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much ❤️ --Chainwit. (talk) 16:07, 29 July 2021 (UTC)