Talk:O.W.C.A. Files

Duytran02
This page (O.W.C.A. Files) is a stub. Please help me by expanding it. Thank you. Duytran02 (talk) 10:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I have restored the article to the redirect for several very important reasons. We don't indiscriminately create episode articles at Wikipedia. Episodes have to be uniquely notable, which means that they must receive the "significant coverage from multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject" that any other article must receive. See our general notability guideline. There has been no attempt to establish that this single episode is notable. Some examples of what might contribute to notability would be any significant real-world context, such whether the episode won a few notable awards (Daytime Emmy? Annie?). Or if the episode has become iconic for its impact and influence on society. (First interracial kiss? Groundbreaking animation technique?) These would naturally all have to be reliably sourced, and I doubt that you're going to find anything like that for this episode. Another example of real-world context might be if the episode was the highest rated episode of the series, but that isn't likely since it appears it got fewer than a million viewers.


 * There are other issues too: The bulk of the article is a massive plot summary that totals 2560 words, five times in excess of the 500 word cap as defined by WP:TVPLOT. We severely limit plot summaries because this much detail can constitute a derivative work, which presents serious copyright concerns. We don't include trivia sections in TV articles, and we certainly wouldn't accept unsourced trivia even if we did. The Continuity section is trivial and of no value to a casual reader. The Allusions section contains unsourced information, speculation and personal interpretation, which contravene our our original research policy. Also, a lot of the content is lifted from Wikia without proper attribution. So on a whole, there is no good reason to maintain this as a unique article at this point. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The image used on the article also has incorrect licensing information. -  Ev il La ir ( ✉  |  c ) 20:48, 12 November 2015 (UTC)