Talk:O:XML

O xml
Another apparently lost/orphaned VfD nom, as I can't find a record of a voting page. Tagged September 29. Note that many of the google hits are for coincidental occurences of "xml" next to the letter "o", not this language. Procedural/weak delete. Niteowlneils 22:50, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable --fvw* 23:10, 2004 Nov 24 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. David Johnson 23:33, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable programming language, and likely more so than many others in Category:Esoteric programming languages. Samaritan 01:37, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Neutral, seems like maybe a promising enough idea to merit an article even if it is not yet in widespread use. However (1) it should be at o:XML unless that creates a namespace problem and (2) this substub is so minimal I suppose it would be no great loss if deleted. Here's a moderately interesting commentary on o:XML. -- Jmabel | Talk 08:03, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. This was one of the mass-nominated esoteric languages from a while ago; I can't find where the archives of that ended up, but I'm pretty sure this is one of the few that got a keep vote regardless of the merits of the batch as a whole. In fact, it isn't particularly esoteric; it is a serious language and moderately notable (try structuring your Google query like this). Yes, the name technically should be o:XML, and fear of namespace problems is probably why it is here. Perhaps we could have a namespace guru tell us what would happen if it was moved. Securiger 09:23, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Needs a name limited by technical limitations plate.  --L33tminion | (talk) 02:58, Nov 26, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable -- 18:24, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment: Above vote left unsigned by user Fledgeling.
 * Keep it, it seems quite noteworthy and easily worthy of inclusion here. &mdash;[[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 04:30, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Invalid vfd (default to keep) : esoteric languages were already voted on before, and consensus was achieved Kim Bruning 18:16, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Can you provide a link, Kim?  --[[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 19:10, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * keep -- WhiteDragon 22:13, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion