Talk:ODIN Technologies

This "article" actually appears to be an advertisement for a consulting company. The phrases "thought leader" and "most sought after business partner" belay a subjective stance usually found in marketing literature. Assuming that Wikipedia is a wiki-based encyclopedia with rigorous peer review for data accuracy, the this "article" would not meet the required standards due to bias, subjectivity, and questionable purpose of content.Metaphusis 20:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)metaphusis


 * agree (recent edits are more blatant) Tedickey (talk) 20:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Appears to be better and more subjective, with many outside references. RBlaine 21:15, 4 November2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.246.121.199 (talk)

Agreed. I edited away some blatant (and badly written) plug for the CEO's book in the "RDFD[]" article. I'd like to flag this article itself, but I'm not sure how to do it. --AntonioBigazzi (talk) 13:09, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Still looks like an advert, and has lots of external links which aren't useful TEDickey (talk) 13:49, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * This page still appears like an advert. It also still has excessive external links to ODIN's corporate webpage.  Only one link is needed to their website, not individual ones embedded in the text. User:Richard.h.blaine removed the advert and external links flags, but they did not make the article sound less of an advertisement, and actually added more unneeded external links. Jmcfarland27 (talk) 19:49, 19 May 2011 (UTC)


 * There have been a few prior incidents of that sort, each from a WP:SPA TEDickey (talk) 21:38, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Blatant advertisement. Offers little else than self promotion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Next gen RFID (talk • contribs) 09:30, 14 November 2011 (UTC)