Talk:ON TV (TV network)

Requested Move
This request has been removed as the article was moved manually by myself to ONTV (pay TV). Any concerns please direct them to the article's talkpage located at Talk:ONTV (pay TV). Thank you. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 19:22, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Requested move 17 October 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

ONTV (pay TV) → ON TV (subscription TV) – In 2012, this article was moved from "ON-TV" to the present title of "ONTV (pay TV)", with the reasoning,

Whom ever originally created this article did so incorrectly as ON-TV, When ONTV premiered in Chicago in 1977 it was promoted as ONTV Subscription Television with no dashes or spaces ... It was never promoted or advertised as ON-TV.

The problem here is that, in some markets, it was. News articles on this subscription TV service, sometimes even in the same newspaper, were inconsistent. As ON TV was not a monolithic operation (its Detroit, Cincinnati and Portland versions were franchised and not owned by Oak Industries), sometimes its affiliates, particularly with regard to Detroit, used hyphenation ("ON-TV"). And "ONTV" is the rarest form in contemporary materials. (Sometimes, it went by "ON", or especially in Detroit, "ON Subscription TV".)

These print ads from all of the ON TV markets show a tendency to ON TV (space), except Detroit:
 * ON TV (Chicago): https://www.newspapers.com/clip/61252785/
 * ON TV (Miami): https://www.newspapers.com/clip/61251794/
 * ON-TV (Detroit): https://www.newspapers.com/clip/61251971/
 * ON TV (Phoenix): https://www.newspapers.com/clip/61252022/
 * ON TV (LA): https://www.newspapers.com/clip/61252328/ — also used “ON” in promos
 * ON TV (DFW): https://www.newspapers.com/clip/61252900/
 * ON TV (PDX): https://www.newspapers.com/clip/61252943/ — also one case of "ON-TV" (hyphen)
 * ON TV (Cincinnati): https://www.newspapers.com/clip/62094071/

Newspaper articles tended toward the hyphen, but not consistently. The Cincinnati Enquirer used all three forms: hyphen, space, and the rare none. In Chicago, the none form was used, but also it was hyphenated and spaced.

In my opinion, the evidence leans toward using a space, particularly given that all five of the Oak-owned ON TV systems (which were Chicago, Miami, Phoenix, LA and DFW) utilized a space in their own print advertising. Also, I changed the disambiguator to "subscription TV" to reflect the terminology used at the time for the entire industry (indeed the LA subsidiary was "National Subscription Television"). Raymie (t • c) 04:39, 17 October 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  23:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment – I don't care for either "(pay TV)" or "(subscription TV)" as disambiguators, as they are both non-standard. IOW, we need a better solution here. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:45, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * We have a bunch of subscription TV articles that are "(TV channel)", as well as Preview (subscription service). The problem for me with that is that ON TV was not even one unified service. Several of the outlets (Detroit, Cincinnati, Portland) used the brand, and programming, under license. Raymie (t • c) 17:03, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * What I'm kind of saying is – if we can come up with a WP:NATURALDIS solution in this case, it would be much better. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:07, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * - Currently ONTV lists a number of television channels with that name disambiguated by country (e.g., ONTV (Egypt)). Why not disambiguate that way? FOARP (talk) 08:14, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Because, under WP:NCBC that's actually incorrect – it should be ONTV (Egyptian TV channel). But Raymie's point is that this particular entity can't be disambiguated by "TV channel", as that's not accurate... In search of the WP:NATURALDIS solution, I wonder if this could be moved to National Subscription Television, the name of the company that "owned" the service. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:09, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The other option might be ON TV (TV network) – if this consisted of channels in 8 different markets, that basically qualifies as a "TV network" under the proper definition (albeit a small one). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:18, 6 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Support - ON TV (TV network) per IJBall to get this thing closed. FOARP (talk) 13:37, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I think I also support moving to ON TV (TV network) as the best available option. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:27, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm here for it, even if it's imprecise. The ownership structure is not such that companies known as "National Subscription Television" were involved in all markets. It wasn't the marketing name of the service anywhere. Most of the newspaper mentions of it as such are classified ads. Articles use "ON TV" and "ON-TV". The services themselves used mostly "ON TV" and less commonly "ON-TV", except Detroit where that was nearly exclusive, in print promotion. And it was very rarely presented without a space or hyphen. (There's a reason I rewrote the article to use "ON TV" in prose from "ONTV"). While not perfect, the "(TV network)" disambiguator comes closer. Raymie (t • c) 17:04, 9 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Anyone going to close this? – There seems to be consensus from the three of us to move to ON TV (TV network), at least as an interim solution. No reason not to just move to that now. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:13, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:37, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Ontvsears1980.jpg