Talk:OPCW Fact-Finding Mission in Syria

Bellingcat
Is the Bellingcat report on the OPCW really noteworthy enough to be included here? We don't want this article to become an edit war battleground do we? I recommend deleting that sentence rather than fighting over sources. It's tangential. BobFromBrockley (talk) 16:30, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Dear User:Bobfrombrockley, yes I agree. Dr. Cross again removed an important part of my sentence plus the link without discussing it here. I will not go in any edit quarel (war) with him. So feel free to do as you like, I will do nothing, better to keep it clean. KR, FrankBierFarmer (talk) 16:36, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Controversy and Whistleblowers
How can this article not include a section on the OPCW inspectors who have gone on record repudiating the organization's report on the Duoma attack? Just today, Aaron Mate at Grayzone reported that internal OPCW documents refute reported claims by the DG and show the leading whistleblower was a key member of the investigation team.76.64.51.70 (talk) 03:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Yep, https://thegrayzone.com/tag/opcw-whistleblowers/ &mdash;Jerome Potts (talk) 11:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The Grayzone was deprecated as an unreliable source in . —  Newslinger   talk   22:41, 20 March 2021 (UTC)