Talk:O (Cyrillic)

Proposed merge from Broad On
That article is about a variant letterform, not a distinct letter. Any objections? —Michael Z. 2008-07-01 23:52 z 


 * Don't merge. The two are distinguished in scribal practice from the earliest sources (even in the Codex Suprasliensis), and even if at this period they are largely positional variants, from the late 16th century they are used also to make grammatical distinctions (which is still the case in modern Church Slavonic).Лудольф (talk) 12:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, I'll remove the move notice. It looks like some repetitive material has crept into this article, and should be cleaned up. —Michael Z. 2008-11-27 02:30 z 

Why is there, in this entry, a different pronunciation than the one the Russian Entry?
Specifically, in the Russian entry I found that the pronunciation is whereas in the English entry I found a Close-mid back rounded vowel which sounds different?

IsraelyHomoSapiens (talk) 14:03, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Other Variants of Cyrillic O
If Broad On deserves its own article, others like Crossed O, Cyrillic Double O, O with left notch and O with open bottom need to be on this article, not only because they're similar to this letter but also because they're just variants. To those who object the article about Broad On to be merged into this article, why do you think it's distinguished from Cyrillic O, despite being considered similar? Besides the fact that those aforementioned pages only have small information. 4lepheus B4ron (talk) 10:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Oppose. They are similar, but not the same. Also some of your named letters aren't just variants, they're different letters. 🪐Kepler-1229b &#124; talk &#124; contribs🪐 17:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)


 * i don't think a computer could even handle a "whole cake of articles" combined together so that's not a good idea... — Preceding undated comment added 22:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Oppose per Kepler-1229b. Great Mercian (talk) 01:22, 10 June 2023 (UTC)