Talk:O Captain! My Captain!

Dead poets society
Should we include, as a margin note, that this poem is used in the movie Dead Poets Society?

Dboonz (talk) 08:52, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you, Dboonz, and thank you, Wikipedia. I came to this article to find just that information. But, knowing Wiki's advice against trivia sections, I figured I'd find what I was looking for in the Article Discussion page. And, voila, here it is! Thanks. Jsharpminor (talk) 18:26, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * And now allow me to contribute something useful... Per Wikipedia's policy - articles are about their subjects. This is both useful and appropriate in the Dead Poets Society page, but seems to be unrelated to this article. Jsharpminor (talk) 05:06, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Capitalization
Just wondering why the quoted version of the poem has capitalization altered from the original? Joshr915 (talk) 06:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

This page needs some fixin'
There is not much here except the poem itself and some references to it. Needs quite a bit of work. VonWoland 06:50, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
 * If no one else does it, I'll do it over the summer :P Mathwhiz 29 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 02:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

The audio file could do with replacing as there are some pronunciation errors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.104.151.45 (talk) 21:27, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Not only pronunciation errors. The VOICE is not appropriate, I think. Ok, Whitman perhaps had a similarvoice according to what I have read somewhere, but I would rather listen to a manlier, deep, voice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.43.187.162 (talk) 04:29, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Excellent Edit!
Good job, 66.71.35.223, whomever you are. You picked up on several typo's in the text of the poem that I missed, in spite of a fairly long time scuitinizning it. VonWoland 02:23, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * snigger* --Kizor 20:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Differences
It would appear that the accepted version of the poem -- the one on this page and in my copy of Leaves of Grass -- differs slightly from the final proof pictured on this page: most notably the line in the third stanza "But I with mournful tread" appears as "But I with silent tread". Whitman was known for making changes to his earlier poetry later in life: is this an example? 24.0.97.119 22:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, as the caption for the picture says it is his original copy, which was published in 1855, the year the first version of Leaves of Grass came out; he later revised it in 1871 and again in 1888. ;) Mathwhiz 29 (talk) 02:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Crampt Full Text Layout
The full text given doesn't employ any new lines, as it should according to the givin photograph. Might we reorganize it thus? : - ''O Captain! my Captain! our fearful trip is done;

''The ship has weather’d every rack, the prize we sought is won;

''The port is near, the bells I hear, the people all exulting,

''While follow eyes the steady keel, the vessel grim and daring:


 * ''But O heart! heart! heart!
 * ''O the bleeding drops of red,
 * ''Where on the deck my Captain lies,
 * ''Fallen cold and dead.

''O Captain! my Captain! rise up and hear the bells;

''Rise up—for you the flag is flung—for you the bugle trills;

''For you bouquets and ribbon’d wreaths—for you the shores a-crowding;

''For you they call, the swaying mass, their eager faces turning;
 * ''Here Captain! dear father!
 * ''This arm beneath your head;
 * ''It is some dream that on the deck,
 * ''You’ve fallen cold and dead.

''My Captain does not answer, his lips are pale and still;

''My father does not feel my arm, he has no pulse nor will;

''The ship is anchor’d safe and sound, its voyage closed and done;

''From fearful trip, the victor ship, comes in with object won;
 * ''Exult, O shores, and ring, O bells!
 * ''But I, with mournful tread,
 * ''Walk the deck my Captain lies,
 * ''Fallen cold and dead.

I know nothing about the poem, so I'm waiting for 48 hours before replacing the version in the articale. Comments, anybody? -- $^{Jonathan}$undefined$^{Sch}$ä$^{fer}$. 05:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Cool :P Mathwhiz 29 (talk) 02:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I'd rather you format it that way. Looks more like a poem, if you know what I mean. Randolf+slayer (talk) 22:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Copyright
The copyright should state that the poem itself has lapsed into the public domain and is not under GFDL. Drbits (talk) 18:09, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Reduction in size
This article was much bigger in June. Why is it that everything except the lead, text, and audio has been deleted? Wikisource now has more background information than this article. --Dromioofephesus (talk) 12:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I was wondering about that myself. The Background & Analysis section was removed in June, and I have now restored it. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Citation needed
The line in particular is "As the voyage ends, so does the captain's life", which the poem depicted to the side clearly states. Unless the problem is with the implied link between the voyage and the captain's life, or with the timing of the captain's death, the "citation needed" should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andr0o (talk • contribs) 04:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Edit request on 14 April 2013
The poem was also used in the show Full House.

72.28.208.41 (talk) 23:10, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry this is not notable. I, and probably many others, have never heard of a show called "Full House". Graham Colm (talk) 23:21, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter whether you or "many others" have heard of it; lists of popular culture references simply aren't appropriate for articles. 70.172.214.70 (talk) 20:57, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Fan Simulations
This poem is also being used in the USS Avalon Star Trek Simulation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simchadude (talk • contribs) 13:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 10 September 2013
Reference to this poem is also made in SUITS, the TV-series

81.129.244.125 (talk) 10:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * No reference, plus we do try to avoid adding uses in non-vital/non-notable ways. A mention on a TV episode is not notable in its own right  ES  &#38;L  11:34, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Analysis section is terrible
The analysis section is poorly written. It reads like a high school essay.

Furthermore, since the central metaphor of the poem is so obvious, much of the "analysis" is unnecessary. It's enough to simply state that it's about Lincoln (as the introduction does).

I don't have or want a Wikipedia account, so I can't delete the section. The only useful information in the analysis is that the rhyming is unusual for Whitman. That should be moved to the introduction. 98.218.180.142 (talk) 01:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 12 October 2013 to the "O Captain! My Captain" page.
In the information about References in Pop Culture, I wish to add Wander Over Yonder to the list of shows that have used the "O Captain! My Captain" line within their show.

HayaMika (talk) 04:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. If you can help with sources to the others listed, that would be great, too. As it is, uncited information like this runs the risk of being deleted. --Stfg (talk) 11:58, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Justification needed
It may be true that 'The poem was known as one of the greatest poems written at the time of the Civil War.' But still it needs justifying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.216.206 (talk) 19:27, 12 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Yeah. And that will be hard, since it depends on agreeing what constitues greatness in a poem. It could run and run ;) Deleted. --Stfg (talk) 20:41, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

format assistance needed
I've just made an edit to the 'in popular culture' section to enhance the reference to this work in the TV show Park and Recreation. The main article links to the correct wikipedia page (on the fictional company 'sweetums') but I did not know how to make this 'tidy'. It currently has an ugly full URL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adagio67 (talk • contribs) 20:43, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I have fixed the formatting, but I think the whole of the "In popular culture" section is uncited trivia and should be deleted. Graham Colm (talk) 22:21, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

The formatting does not look right (though the links are all correct). currently it's "Parks and Recreation, and as proposed eulogy to Ron Swanson, in series 2 episode 14 of Sweetums (Parks and Recreation)", it should read  Parks and Recreation, as a proposed eulogy to Ron Swanson, in series 2 episode 14, "Sweetums"," . (Sweetums is the episode name and has it's own page, as do the character mentioned and the series itself). I've done what corrections I could
 * I haven't a clue as to what you are trying to say. Graham Colm (talk) 21:41, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean by 'uncited'. this 'in popular culture' section appears to describe clearly where the poem is referred to/used in popular culture and as such I believe it is of interest and should remain. Not being an American, I was not familiar with it until it was referenced in P&R which, having looked it up and found this page, led to my clarifying the mention of that reference here Adagio67 (talk) 16:58, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * It still needs referencing to a reliable source. Graham Colm (talk) 21:41, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Style of the "Analysis" section
The line by line analysis seems to be too lengthy and unnecessarily detailed - much like a teacher teaching in a class. Could it be written differently? &#39;&#39;Prabhakar Sarma Neog&#39;&#39; (talk) 08:26, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

placement of analysis
Imho, it would make more sense if we put the analysis after the text of the poem?--little Alex (talk) 05:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Removed from article
The following doesn't fit in the article, but am pasting here for posterity: Eddie891 Talk Work 22:05, 1 November 2020 (UTC) When the publisher Harper requested to reprint the poem in a school course reader, Whitman said "It's My Captain again; always My Captain," and wrote that he told John Swinton he was sorry he wrote the poem "but there's no help for it now: let's resign ourselves to the inevitable!"

Nautical allusion to Nelson's death
I am having trouble finding reliable secondary sources to support the allusions to Nelson's death that I personally feel every time I hear the poem.

The Religious imagery section provides citations to Schöberlein's contrived interpretation that:"The poem's speaker places its 'arm beneath [Lincoln's] head' in the same way that 'Mary cradled Jesus' after his crucifixion. With Lincoln's death, 'the sins of America are absolved into a religio-sentimental, national family'" There is no support for the implication that Whitman was aware of Correggio's 1525 Deposition.

Yet there is no mention of the simpler interpretation that the imagery of the speaker's arm beneath the head could be based on the image found here which clearly shows an arm beneath the head at. It is more likely that Whitman has seen images like this 1841 publication that fit much better with the nautical imagery of the poem.

It is interesting to note that even if the analysis at "Penny's poetry pages Wiki" came from a source more reliable than fandom.com, it could not be "quoted". Nelson is never mentioned in the text. Simply displaying the image next to the relevant stanzas has a much more powerful effect (at least on me) than the "Religious imagery" section. Annette Maon (talk) 11:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The difference is that a secondary source references Correggio's Deposition, while secondary analysis doesn't substantiate a connection to that image (I've been looking in to some analysis of nelson and the nautical allusions-- there isn't much. While you are welcome to criticize Schöberlein's interpretation all you want, he is a respected scholar and his opinion isn't going anywhere, regardless of what you may "personally feel"-- I bet many people hear many things when listening to the poem. I'm not sure exactly what you want here, we cannot just add an image without sourcing to support its connection. YOu're welcome to find reliable sources establishing this connection. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:43, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

I am not suggesting that Schöberlein's interpretation should go anywhere. As I have no access to his analysis I assume good faith on the part of the editor who added that section. The religious imagery can be relevant and notable even if Whitman had never seen Correggio's painting. The connection to the poem may not be as explicit as the nautical imagery but as long as the secondary source supports it - it is not going anywhere. The only secondary source that I found with explicit reference to Nelson's death and Whitman's nautical background makes no specific mention of the image which I found at a fandom site. I can not prove a direct link between the two but it seems more likely to me that Whitman might have seen that image (or something like it) in an English book published in 1841 than that he saw a color reproduction of an Italian painting at a time when the technology to reproduce such paintings did not yet exist.

I agree that we can not just add an image without a secondary source to support the connection. It would be nice if someone could find better sources. In the meantime, is the reference I did find to Nelson's death reliable enough to support the connection based on the title of the image? Annette Maon (talk) 23:09, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Rasel khan @ 2409:40E6:2B:6F69:78B3:2FB1:925D:DD13 (talk) 17:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)