Talk:Oath Keepers

Allegiance to Trump?
What is the basis on their allegiance to Trump?￼ 2003:E5:701:ADF7:8874:639E:EC9A:9C1A (talk) 18:33, 18 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Are you referring to the info-box? There isn't one, so I shall remove it. TFD (talk) 01:47, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 October 2023
The Oath Keepers definition is wrong.the following definition is correct. -Oath Keepers Pro government. Constitutional service organization. 2600:1014:B08E:261B:80A6:25FA:22DF:B50F (talk) 19:25, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * This is incoherent. Girth Summit  (blether)  19:33, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

The Blaze
I'm not sure how reliable the Blaze is, and I'm hoping that more reliable sources will report on this claim to see if it's true or false. Anyway, the Blaze is claiming that video from January 6 proves that one of the witnesses who testified in the Oath Keepers trial lied under oath. The video has been made public, so it should not be hard for other sources to investigate the claim by the Blaze.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/just-released-jan-6-videos-show-capitol-police-officer-lied-in-oath-keepers-trial-blaze-media-investigative-journalist-says

https://twitter.com/theblaze/status/1746974003317579834

SquirrelHill1971 (talk) 21:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Your direct support ensures that the stores that matter most, those buried by Big Tech and the mainstream media narratives, will be brought to light. Yeah, no way. VQuakr (talk) 21:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * WP:RSP is useful for checking the reliability of sources. In this case it says "Blaze Media (including TheBlaze) is considered generally unreliable for facts." JaggedHamster (talk) 07:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)