Talk:Oberlin College/Archive 1

Google search
In a Google search for "Oberlin College" this article shows up in the top 10 results (Dec 29, 2005). User:Ceyockey 17:32, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Duh. Wikipedia was created to replace the internet, just like Google. Its a conspiracy.

Expand tag
I'm restoring the expand tag on this article that I removed a few hours ago. User WAvegetarian indicates that it is still needed. --Lockley 05:06, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * There is certainly more to say about it, but I don't think I said that it is still needed. I just noticed that not much had been added since the tag was first applied. &mdash;WAvegetarian&bull; CONTRIBUTIONS TALK &bull; EMAIL &bull; 20:22, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Oberlin's IP Range
Watch edits from 132.162.0.0/16 as this is the Oberlin network. I'm not saying they are all bad edits—I'm currently editing from Oberlin—but that we should pay special attention to them as they are self edits. &mdash;WAvegetarian TALKCONTRIBSEMAIL 02:31, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Deletion
To say that Oberlin is considered by many to be one of the best liberal arts colleges, though I do agree with this opinion, is really nothing more than a point of view--and is, therefore, not encyclopedic. 172.131.71.211 21:11, 6 January 2006

Saying that Oberlin is one of the best is an opinion, though there are objective measures by which it is seen to be one of the best, such as size of library. Reporting that it is considered by others to be one of the best is NPOV. Matchups 19:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC) (Note: I'm an alum)

I would agree with the anon user above and say that you should not say "considered by many" in an encyclopedia unless it is a very common viewpoint (eg. "Shakespeare is considered by many to be the greatest playwright of all time") and could easily be backed by some references (eg. voted the top playwright by the libarian association of america). It's just way too vague - I would argue that I could add similar lines to virtually every college's article. Rm999 02:09, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

It's not just this article. Wikipedia has many articles with the phrase "considered by many," many of which go on say "...to be (one of) the best..." Still, I agree that the article could be improved by replacing those words with something more encyclopdic, such as "Considered as one of the best liberal arts colleges based on its having the largest library, the most graduates going on to receive PhDs, and its frequent high position in the annual US News and World Report ranking." Perhaps the next step is to get references for these statements. (from Matchups--sorry, I forgot the tildes)

I just found that there is an official Wikipedia style guide saying to avoid 'weasel' terms such as "considered by many" and 'peacock' terms such as "one of the best." So I will see what I can do to make it more encyclopedic. Matchups 04:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

I never attended Oberlin (and in fact attended Miami University) however I am very fond of Oberlin. Among the smaller liberal arts schools, it's one of the best. Those in academia and knowledgeable about higher education hold this school in very high regard. Props to you Oberlin.

The Notes superscripts
I recently added the "endowment" information in the infobox and the corresponding note. However, I just noticed that the superscript link to Notes section (after the endowment amount) shows up as [2] instead of [1] as it should be. Does anyone know how to fix this? I don't have the Wiki editing knowledge to do so. If you do, please fix it. Thanks.

More generally, the numbering of footnotes in the article and the numbering in the notes section is not in sync. This is due, at least in part, to notes 3 and 4 about excos, which are direct external links. I am unsure how to resolve this problem, but I am sure someone can. 65.120.95.103 09:30, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Dye's "departure"
Retirement suggests stopping work or peacefully moving on to another profession. When she resigned as president there was a buzz on campus about whether she might try to stay on as she is a full tenured history professor. It certainly wasn't, and still isn't, expected on campus that she will leave academia. On that point, she did not say she was retiring or getting out of academia, rather that it was "the right time for [her] to leave." Hard copies of this were also distributed to students and parents. This decision and announcement came right after her heavy handed dealing with deans resulted in much criticism and the controversial resignation of a well liked dean. There was also the small issue of the vote of no confidence. Shortly before the announcement a letter was circulated and signed by dozens of tenured faculty calling for her resignation. The Oberlin Review has yet to use the word "resignation" in a headline, but has called it that in the body and leads of their articles. .

If this isn't a resignation than I don't know what is.—WAvegetarian•(talk) 21:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

I know that the word 'retirement' is being used by various senior administrators and college spokespeople, although not all the time (sometimes they just talk about her 'leaving'). I agree that the timing of her announcement was tied to various growing pressures on campus, but it's interesting to note that, by preempting the reported no-confidence vote and framing everything as her own decision, she basically prevented 'resignation' being the most-correct label. Also, retirement doesn't mean she won't be back in academia - Michael Jordan retired from basketball, then unretired; no one believes Bill Parcells when he says he's retiring, but the writers call it a retirement. Semantic fun indeed... Squalk25 17:26, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Squalk25

Oberlin Steel
I moved the line "Oberlin College is also home to Oberlin Steel, one of the premier college steel drum bands in the United States." From the introduction to the section on music, where it more appropriately belongs. PubliusVarrus 19:00, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Marvin Krislov
Should Marvin Krislov be listed as the president now? He was named as the president recently, but will not take office until July 1st. (http://www.oberlin.edu/presidentsearch/krislov/)

68.40.254.194 16:12, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * No, he doesn't take office until July 1st, so he is still the U. Mich. vp until then. We don't change the current president listed for United States on Nov. 3. She is still the acting president until July. —WAvegetarian (talk) 05:28, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Katharine Wright
I have removed the following text from the article. Wright has no WP article and should not be included as a "most notable" alumna. But perhaps the material belongs somewhere else.
 * Katharine Wright, sister to Orville and Wilbur Wright and head of their household since the age of 15, also graduated from Oberlin in 1898 and later served as a trustee. After Orville's death in 1929, he donated over $300,000 to Oberlin college, after which the physics building on campus was renamed after the Wright brothers.

Matchups 12:36, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Looking for a Public Domain photo
For the article on Shields Green and maybe for Lewis Sheridan Leary I'm looking for a public domain photo of their "gravestone" (they are not buried there) that's in Martin Luther King Jr Park, on Vine Street in Oberlin.

The details, and a copyrighted photo can be found on. .

Anybody interested in making a quick snap-shot, donating it to the public domain, and posting it in the Shields Green article?

Smallbones 15:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm going to be back in Oberlin next Saturday and can take the photo. Please send me an email as a reminder if you don't see one posted up by the end of next weekend.—WAvegetarian (talk) 07:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks - more on your talk page. Smallbones 08:25, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Dascomb Naming Issue
It is my memory that Dascomb is named for Mary Dascomb the first head of the Female College. However not being at Oberlin anymore I can't verify who is on the plaque in the dorm. Dalassa 13:47, 18 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Absolutely true. See this article from the college archives.  I don't have the time right right now to do a good rewrite on the main page, but maybe in a few days if nobody beats me to it (& I hope they do). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by  Matchups (talk • contribs) 16:46, June 18, 2006  (UTC)


 * I've made the change myself based on the archive link you provided. Dalassa 22:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Please note that the present Dascomb Hall is not to be confused with the first hall named for Marianne Dascomb, Dascomb Cottage.--Jthurn 17:28, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


 * True. Also note, however, that there is a plaque within Dascomb Hall commemorating Marianne Dascomb and Dascomb Cottage. Jorgath 13:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

"Obie" Culture
Looking back over past edits, the list of popular musicians in "Obie" Culture changes rather often. While I don't think the edits are malicious, they serve to point out that the list is inherently not verifiable, not notable, not neutral, and not encyclopedic. I've removed this list from the article. If an artist becomes notable, place them in Notable Alumni. On campus artist gossip should stay there.


 * Some popular Oberlin musicians, past and present, include Karen O of the Yeah Yeah Yeahs, Jug Free America, Di$h and ShiQuana, The Trashbirds, Skeletons and the Girl Faced Boys, The Empty Mirror, Headless Body in a Topless Bar, Guerilla 16, Liz Phair, and Skeletonbreath.

132.162.213.109 19:04, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

I've removed the following paragraph; I think it needs more clarity (what "the students" have been active towards changing vs. what has actually been done/changed), or a citation, or both. Eric&#39;s penguin 02:17, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Recent activism among the student body has involved the divestment of stocks in companies that do business with the Israeli military, a campus-wide ban on Coca-Cola products, and a vote of no-confidence in the college's president, Nancy Dye.

I see your concerns about the above paragraph. While I did not write it, I think it is useful in keeping the wiki entry up-to-date, and so have added a revised version. I have attempted to address your concerns by removing things where the activism has not resulted in any change (e.g. divestment) and adding citations, via links to relevent news articles, where appropriate. 65.120.95.103 09:36, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

I was looking through the Obie Culture section, and noticed the section on the Bike Derby. It was my understanding that the last Bike Derby was in 1997. Has it started up again? If not, we should remove that.

Also, the section on streaking and nudity could be cleaned up, imho. While it should be addressed, I'm not sure it needs three sentences.

Just my thoughts...

24.240.130.188 18:05, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


 * There were definitely bike derbies in 2006 and 2005, and I'm pretty sure in 2003. They've become very low-promotion events because the fire at the end pisses off the fire department, and something inevitably pisses off the cops. --&#x2014;alxndr&#x00a0; (t) 03:50, 29 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah...but Safety and Security got really angry this past year because there was a huge huge stinky fire, worse than previous years'. So, maybe someone should edit it so that it is obvious that the Bike Derby is certainly not college-sanctioned. --Mogwit 16:18, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Notable Faculty
Should a section be added for notable faculty, past and present (e.g., Clarence Ward, David Orr)? Tevi (talk) 18:46, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Conspicuous by Its Absence
I don't see the phrase "gay rights" anywhere. Is this the same Oberlin...little town in Ohio?

Speck22 (talk) 21:02, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Notable Oberlin architecture
As a student currently attending, I can't help but notice numerous buildings around campus that are designed by noteworthy architects. Quite a few buildings surrouding Tappan Square are the Cass Gilbert's work, while Hall Auditorium is designed by Wallace Harrison, the architect who worked on the United Nations HQ. This is a subject I believe is worth mention. Any thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leizmonk (talk • contribs) 20:30, June 6, 2006


 * Don't forget that the Con, King, and Warner were designed by Minoru Yamasaki. &#x2014;alxndr&#x00a0; (t) 06:33, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

My favorite buildings were the "Richardsonian Gothic" buildings--Peters Hall, for instance. These are very complicated 19th century Victorian buildings with towers, spiral staircases, observatories, and even hidden rooms. 1970 alum Steve Eardley —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.69.190.75 (talk) 18:15, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

I'd agree that the architecture of campus is worth noting, both for its distinctiveness and the value it adds to things like the art history program. I'm not really qualified to weigh in on which buildings matter and why, but there was a History professor a number of years ago who published a book on the architecture of the town. At least some of the info from that book is found on this website: http://www.oberlin.edu/external/EOG/gbslides/AShortHistory.html Squalk25

Requestion for citation on "highly selective"
That a college is highly selective in one way or another is unsurprising. This claim either needs substance, a citation, or to be removed.

Note that it is improper to remove a request for citation without explanation, as was done by an anonymous with no other edits at: 24.130.11.114

Sorry, I missed the earlier discussion on the same subject, as noted by Matchups, in the history. If someone will please put in a citation, that would probably work well for me, and the other editor who called it a "peacock phrase".

I was the one who removed the request for a citation because I feel like you're being an online ass. Take a look at any other liberal arts college wikipedia; There is no request for a citation or a citation in the first sentence where it states "highly selective." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.162.183.41 (talk) 15:32, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

24.130.14.173 (talk) 11:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I removed "highly selective" from the lead since this conveys no actual information (how high? what is high and what isn't high? who says it is high? etc.) and is a peacock word for academic boosterism. Madcoverboy (talk) 19:18, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Peacock terms
Added WP:PEACOCK. Please check this article against the specific examples and general idea of Avoid_peacock_terms. Some examples: -- Wikipedia is not a recruiting brochure -- WP:NOT IMHO this article is not nearly as bad as many with "PEACOCK" problems, but still should be improved. -- Writtenonsand (talk) 21:23, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * "The Allen Memorial Art Museum is one of the top handful of college or university art collections in the nation"
 * "Student unrest following what was widely perceived as the heavy-handed arrests of protesters on the lawn of then-President S. Frederick Starr's home"
 * " Studying alongside such gifted individuals adds to the diversity of the school, as they do not quite fit the mold of the typical liberal arts student."
 * " Oberlin is also notable for its unique art rental program."
 * "Oberlin is also famous for Safer Sex Night and the Drag Ball ..."
 * -- The whole section "Notable alumni" is IMHO a little "iffy".
 * "Students often laugh at the portrayed image of the campus"


 * Many of these examples are not peacock terms; in the "Student unrest" example, "widely perceived" might be weasel words, but are not peacock; similarly for "often laugh." "Heavy handed" might be POV, except that the article isn't saying that the arrests were, just that they were perceived that way, so I think that's okay.  The most recent edit to the page removed a few peacock terms, plus one which I thought was okay--"highly selective" is verifiable (see elsewhere on this page); someone needs to actually add the reference that so many of these posters seem to be familiar with.  At some point, I will read through the enire article and see if I feel it's ready for the peacock tag to be removed. Matchups (talk) 02:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I just went through and rewrote some parts that had peacock problems - does it look okay now?--Quaere (talk) 20:16, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I just went through it again. I saw no further peacock terms. Jorgath (talk) 12:56, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

addition
i also add oberlin college was indeed founded by congregationalists, but these congregationalist viewpoints on slavery are not historically clear and these asserted congregationalist viewpoints on slavery should be duly referenced when presented on wikipedia. wellington, ohio located ten miles due south of oberlin is historically recognized as being at one end of the underground railroad. the abolitionist john brown lived in hudson/kent, (Four Dead in O H I O) approximately sixty miles due east of oberlin. john brown recruited John Anthony Copeland, Jr. from oberlin before his raid on harpers ferry, virginia (now west virginia). i'm under the impression that oberlin college did not allow african-americans to attend oberlin college until after the civil war, therefore John Anthony Copeland, Jr. may not have been a student at oberlin college. unfortunately, ohioans in oberlin and wellington returned runaway slaves IAW the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 (see Oberlin-Wellington Rescue) before the american civil war.


 * The college was founded by Presbyterians, according to the town's web site and to Encyclopedia Britannica. Radagast3 (talk) 03:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

oberlin college resides centrally within the municipality of oberlin, and there is a political and justice rift between townies (principally african-americans like John Anthony Copeland, Jr.) and obies (students of white and jewish privilege. chelsey clinton visted the oberlin college campus in 1999). oberlin college is an american sanctuary of progressive activism, but wikipedia editors are reminded to cite sources appropriately. obie grads are a special breed and certainly worthy of touting their horns, and most obies despise nancy dye. παράδοξος (talk) 06:34, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Notable Obies
I moved this section, as well as the discussions of Yvette Clarke and Wendell Willkie to the Talk:List of Oberlin College alumni page, as part of splitting off that new article.

Added Michelle Malkin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.192.68.98 (talk) 18:07, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

School Colors
While the article lists the school colors as Crimson and Gold (specifically Athletic Gold) it mentions that maroon/burgundy is a substitute. In an effort to create uniformity among the school's athletics, the decision was made that the official Yeoman Athletics colors would be maroon/bugundy & athletic gold. This being a problem as the colors were mismatched across the teams on campus. For instance the Football Team wore a more scarlett colored maroon with Old Gold (or Notre Dame Gold), where as the Men's Lacrosse Team featured a deeper maroon/burgundy and Gold (or Athletic Gold). Another instance is the Basketball temas which had the deeper maroon/burgundy combined with Old Gold. However with the departure of AD Vin Lananna, who spear-headed the plan, it has yet to be put into affect, at least that I have seen. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by USER NAME OR IP (talk • contribs).

I wonder what the Oberlin College Archives has on the historical origins and modern use of the "official" school colors. Perhaps someone on campus can visit them with this topic in mind. --Jthurn 17:14, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

This topic does not merit two-thirds of the opening paragraph. Robert Loring (talk) 02:57, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

moving unsourced list to talk
I am depositing a long list of unsourced supposed mentions in pop culture below that was previously listed in the trivia section. Please do not move any of it back without adding proper citations using reliable sources. Toddst1 (talk) 21:06, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Many of these should be self-sourcing--a book is a reliable source with regard to its own content. I believe that the same could be said for TV shows where the episode is mentioned.  But even aside from sourcing, I am concerned that much of this is trivia.  I would propose to keep Absurdistan, Beloved, The Bluest Eye, Boys and Girls Together, The Color of Light, The Daily Show, Eurotrip, Gary Unmarried, The Shadow Over Innsmouth, and The West Wing (assuming they can be sourced), which have interesting or substantive references to the college, and remove the rest. Matchups 04:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

FERPA and 2013 bias incidents
An unregistered editor has repeatedly inserted information into this article discussing FERPA and its role in preventing or making unlawful the university releasing student information related to the bias incidents that "occurred" (I think that one or more have at this point been identified as hoaxes). While this law may have played a role in the information released or not released, we need reliable sources that clearly document that fact. Without such sources, it's pure speculation by Wikipedia editors whether this law played a role and what role it played in Oberlin's decisions and actions. This is particularly problematic given how often and how easily many people, including higher education professionals who should know better, misunderstand and misapply FERPA. In other words, this issue is complicated enough without Wikipedia editors trying to insert their own speculations and guesses. If you'd like this material to remain in this article, find reliable sources that supports it. ElKevbo (talk) 21:32, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Story about Oberlin College slam poet
In news unfortunately.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 13:04, 24 September 2014 (UTC) Just noting, however, I found no other sources to confirm this, so it may be a hoax?--Tomwsulcer (talk) 13:07, 24 September 2014 (UTC) Oberlin University not college, never mind this.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 13:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * More importantly, it's a satirical news site. Fitnr 15:33, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Political Activism section
There is information in this section I think is worth taking out or moving that has nothing to do with student activism, but are rather comments about college speakers likely invited by the administration, and how the college is ranked on a list of college according to acceptability for students of different genders." The following "paragraph", is not cited:

"Oberlin is also known for its liberal attitude toward sexuality and gender expression. Oberlin was ranked among the 20 friendliest campuses for LGBT students in The Advocate's College Guide for LGBT Students.[62] Several different student groups exist to support the interests of LGBT students and their allies. External evaluations have determined that conservative viewpoints are often disallowed from public expression on campus."

Best. Wwiikkeeppeeddiiaa (talk) 04:12, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Historical strictures
Ancdotally, an ante bellum administrator at Oberlin, one David Campbell, enforced dietary and behavioral rules to the point of firing faculty. I ran across this in Sylvester Graham's article (section 2, "Grahamites"). If it can be sourced, I think it makes a notable counterbalance to the permissive school of today. At the time, this was thought progressive. Rags (talk) 17:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Oberlin College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080930194033/http://frontpagemag.com:80/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=63F0BBAF-685D-49D8-811D-FA1BF266CB2B to http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/Read.aspx?GUID=63F0BBAF-685D-49D8-811D-FA1BF266CB2B

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers. —cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 08:41, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Oberlin College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131104031656/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/50817568/ to http://www.nbcnews.com/id/50817568/#.US2RrBlyAfI

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 12:49, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Selectivity
Many other colleges and university articles, especially selective colleges like Oberlin have a section on average board scores and difficulty of admission. Should one be added? Usually, according to the Wiki protocol on colleges and universities, this belongs in a section called "Profile."

Whoever's adding the "citation needed" to highly selective needs to stop. No other major liberal arts college doesn't make that claim and no other liberal arts college has an editor adding this citation needed.

Quality of Oberlin
Perhaps the discussion on subjective comments about quality can be addressed by using words like "highly selective liberal arts college." The Princeton Review ranks the selectivity of colleges from 60 (not selective or non-reporting) to 100 (highly selective). Oberlin's selectivity is rated at 99.

Actually, it's a 96, which is still impressive, putting it on par with most peer institutions... ranking, for instance, just below Cornell University (97), an Ivy League institution

Yvette Clarke and Wendell Willkie
Discussion moved to the Talk:List of Oberlin College alumni page, as part of splitting off that new article.

Karega Controversy
The section on Joy Karega's controversial Facebook posts seems awfully prominent to be alongside the milestones of a particularly historic college. The section in question describes a few incidents of blatantly false conspiracy theories posted on a professor's personal social media account and thus, is rather negligible relative to the events discussed in the preceding section. I believe text on Karega, if it should be in the article at all, should be a small reference in a separate section.

Agreed. Both "Controversy over SFP Protest" and "Karega Controversy" seem strangely minor in the broad sweep of the school's history to merit such prominent placement in the broader history section; after all, they are the only particular incidents given their own subsections. Thoughts on moving them elsewhere? There isn't a section that they would naturally fit into currently, but it seems like an appropriate move. Jhgtg (talk) 15:54, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on Oberlin College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20151109231238/http://www.naicu.edu:80/member_center/members.asp to http://www.naicu.edu/member_center/members.asp
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120308152212/http://new.oberlin.edu/events-activities/black-history/at-oberlin.dot to http://new.oberlin.edu/events-activities/black-history/at-oberlin.dot
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/awards/excellenceacademic.cfm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/awards/librarianoftheyear/englishspeech.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

International Cooperation
This section seems to have been created to note the fact that individual students participated in this certain exchange program, though it seems like an extremely minor point, and it doesn't discuss other types of exchange programs/scholarships that send students to various countries. Thoughts on deletion of section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhgtg (talk • contribs) 16:12, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Oberlin ratings
This page includes the information that "Oberlin was ranked among the 20 friendliest campuses for LGBT students in The Advocate's College Guide for LGBT Students." Based on this, I think it is legitimate to include Oberlin's ranking as an unfriendly school for Jews by a Jewish newspaper. For the editors that think that is undue, please explain why Oberlin's ranking for friendliness for LGBTs is relevant and its ranking for friendliness for Jews is not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Talulah James (talk • contribs) 15:43, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I have nothing against including any rankings. But you do need to show that the ranking is meaningful and not WP:UNDUE. For example, do various reliable sources discuss these rankings? The point is that anyone can throw up a ranking, we should only include ones that have some traction in the broader world.You need to demonstrate that with the friendliness for Jews one. --regentspark (comment) 17:29, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * At a minimum, a reliable secondary source should be provided to establish that somebody besides the editors of The Algemeiner cares what The Algemeiner thinks. The same is true of The Advocate; it should not be cited as the only source for its own ratings. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 11:21, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

And yet, neither of you has deleted the information about The Advocate's ranking, or provided the type of secondary information that you asked for from me. Nevertheless, I will provide what you asked for Talulah James (talk) 01:07, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Talulah james
 * You could just go ahead and delete it yourself. This is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit! --regentspark (comment) 01:19, 19 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Talulah James, the idea is that you get consensus here first and then post the consensus version on the talk page. Labeling an entire college or university "unfriendly toward Jews" is not something that should be done lightly. We should first see if the view is significant enough to be included. If it is, we need to see if there are opposing perspectives. If there are, we need to frame our text appropriately. Please use the talk page and stop edit warring. --regentspark (comment) 13:25, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

I have provided all sources that were requested of me. You asked for secondary sources showing people care what the Algemeiner thinks, and I gave four. What are your other problems? Since no one has a problem with the Advocate, it seems like there is a double standard being applied. Talulah James (talk) 13:28, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Talulah James
 * Please provide reputable sources; several of the ones you have provided - the National Post, the New York Post, and Truth Revolt - are low quality at best and complete garbage at worst. ElKevbo (talk) 13:41, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

National Post is a National Canadian paper and New York Post is a top New York paper. Plus, the fact that I provided four shows that many people read the Algemeiner and care what it says. The fact that you may not like these papers does not make them "complete garbage." Talulah James (talk) 13:56, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Talulah James

Per WP:CON "Consensus on Wikipedia does not mean unanimity (which, although an ideal result, is not always achievable); nor is it the result of a vote. Decision-making involves an effort to incorporate all editors' legitimate concerns..." Concerns were raised over secondary sources, and secondary sources were provided. Other than Truth Revolt these are good sources. Therefore, all legitimate concerns have been met. For those that are still seeking to delete this information, I wonder whether you may have a conflict of interest, for example, alumni or even administrators of the school seeking to protect its reputation? If so please see WP:CONFLICT " Any external relationship can trigger a conflict of interest.[a] That someone has a conflict of interest is a description of a situation, not a judgment about that person's opinions or integrity.[b] COI editing is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia." Moreover, the failure of the editors who deleted material to respond to the last comment also does not seem to show good faith. Judy Somerville (talk) 16:10, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Judy Somerville
 * I can't speak for anyone else but I have very little to say to someone who genuinely believes that the National Post, New York Post, and Truth Revolt are high quality sources that should be used as the basis for adding information to encyclopedia articles. ElKevbo (talk) 16:31, 24 April 2017 (UTC)


 * This is a list of all the Wikipedia pages that rely on the New York Post as a source https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/New_York_Post&limit=5000 There are literally thousands. Also, no one has objected to the Jewish Exponent as a source. Your objections are not valid. If you continue to block this edit, the assumption that you are acting in good faith will be difficult to maintain. Judy Somerville (talk) 18:21, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Judy Somerville


 * Let me see if I've got this straight. The articles in New York Post (a marginal news source), the National Post, and The Jewish Exponent don't mention Oberlin, just that the Algemeiner published a list. The only "source" cited in support of the inclusion of Oberlin in the list (beside the Algemeiner) is TruthRevolt?!? That's no source at all! — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:31, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your initial comment was that you needed to see that someone cares what the Algemeiner thinks. Four sources that care what the Algemeiner thinks were provided. One, the NY Post, is a source cited frequently in Wikipedia. Even though The NY Post does not mention Oberlin specifically, because Oberlin is a small school, it shows that the Algemeiner list is consequential. In contrast, you still have not deleted or made the same requirement of the rankings from the Advocate. Why are you are applying a double standard? Talulah James (talk) 20:15, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Talulah James
 * TJ, please read WP:RS. None of the sources you've listed are remotely reliable and do not demonstrate that these rankings have any significance. --regentspark (comment) 20:28, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would read more carefully, Talulah James, you would see that I wrote "At a minimum, a reliable secondary source should be provided to establish that somebody besides the editors of The Algemeiner cares what The Algemeiner thinks." (emphasis added) That is a bare minimum requirement, which I believe you have satisfied although it appears other editors do not. However, no reliable source has been cited to show that anybody cares what The Algemeiner thinks about Oberlin , the subject of this article, not even a student newspaper. I think that's telling.
 * After meeting minimum sourcing requirements, you need to satisfy other editors' concerns that the material you wish to include does not give undue weight to a relatively unimportant aspect of the college and that we keep the coverage in relative proportion to its importance, as determined based on other reliable, published material on Oberlin. Even if we could find a dozen reliable sources about it, does the fact that the dining hall has been painted green belong in this article? (I just made that up as an example, and I'm not trying to trivialize Jewish life on campus, but I hope you understand my point.) In importance, The Algemeiners "1st Annual List of the US and Canada's Worst Campuses for Jewish Students" is obviously more important than the color of the dining hall, but is it something that warrants a two-sentence paragraph? Any mention at all? You need to convince us that, even though no reliable source seemed to cared enough to report Oberlin's ranking in The Algemeiners list, Wikipedia should report it. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 23:20, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Oberlin College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081206012732/http://www.cityofoberlin.com/Administration/community.html to http://www.cityofoberlin.com/Administration/community.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012011301/http://www.sculpturecenter.org/oosi/sculpture.asp?SID=44 to http://www.sculpturecenter.org/oosi/sculpture.asp?SID=44
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080120174527/http://www.oberlin.edu/colrelat/welcome/octour/stourart.html to http://www.oberlin.edu/colrelat/welcome/octour/stourart.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140512221235/http://new.oberlin.edu/office/creativity/funding-opportunities/fellowships/ to http://new.oberlin.edu/office/creativity/funding-opportunities/fellowships/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140807212158/http://oclaunchu.com/members/ to http://oclaunchu.com/members/
 * Added tag to http://www.wkyc.com/news/education/article/283663/35/Oberlin-Students-protest-no-trespass-list-
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090201054458/http://upa.org/college/top25history/2008-top25-open.shtml to http://upa.org/college/top25history/2008-top25-open.shtml
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/glac/adhi1b.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:31, 26 July 2017 (UTC)