Talk:Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox

NPOV
Added NPOV tag: the initial write of the article seems to have been based on a couple of news articles that missed facts that are less favorable to the defendant, and as those facts came out, they seem to have all been squeezed into a sentence near the end. I've added a couple of sentences, but a full-scale rewrite might be needed. 130.132.198.162 (talk) 00:27, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Oh, and also, might be worth mentioning the connected WIPO litigation if someone has time - https://randazza.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/randazza-v-cox-decision-d2012-1525.pdf 130.132.198.162 (talk) 00:36, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Cox wins appeal
Does someone who has been editing this article want to incorporate the latest news of Cox winning the appeal and overturning the defamation award?

http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2014/01/17/12-35238.pdf

http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-blogger-1st-amendment-20140118,0,3524030.story#axzz2r0WREQma

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/17/us-usa-blogger-ruling-idUSBREA0G1HI20140117

Otherwise I will give it a go Philiashasspots (talk) 05:36, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

http://jonathanturley.org/2014/01/20/federal-court-bloggers-have-same-first-amendment-rights-as-journalists/ Philiashasspots (talk) 07:58, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of California, Berkeley supported by WikiProject Cyberlaw and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program&#32;during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC)