Talk:Occupational illness

Joint effort
Hello, to the creator of this page. Good on you for creating such an excellent page as a beginner. I've decided to take this page on as a task, we can work together. I'm amazed that a page like this or similar didn't exist! Anyway, thanks for the base to build on. To anyone else coming to the page please help out! If, in the future you're looking at the first comment on a GA nominated article's talk page, then I rock. Yeah, go me. Bennyboyz3000 10:23, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * After some extensive reviewing and redoing, I have placed a few tags (npov), verify, wikify on this page. with a simple scan you will find the article is almost entirely POV comments, unverified claims, original research, etc. If someone else could join in and help out that would be just great! - Bennyboyz3000 10:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Merge with Occupational disease
The terms "occupational disease" and "occupational illness" are merely two ways of naming the same thing. Separate articles, especially as undeveloped as these two are, are not needed. Pzavon 00:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I fully agree, which is why I redirected, since there didn't seem to be anything in this article worth saving given the poor style, poor writing, and the complete lack of references. THF 06:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)


 * But you had redirected to Industrial injury, which is a different thing entirely. I am proposing merging with Occupational Disease  Pzavon 01:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm going to redirect to Occupational disease without merging anything. I found this article on on a bot-generated list to detect conflict of interest, and I traced the original version to http://ezinearticles.com/?Industrial-Illness-and-Occupational-Disease-Campaign-Article&id=577684 .  Hence, I am redirecting in lieu of speedy deletion per CSD G12, copyright violation. Yechiel Man  17:44, 19 June 2007 (UTC)