Talk:Ocean Lake

PROD
I was going to take PROD off this when I discovered that the author had already done it. I think the article is valid. The subject is a prominent geographical feature, several miles across. That alone seems to be sufficient notability for inclusion. It is not some village duck pond. There is only one reference but that is good enough for a stub. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:15, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

What next?
I think the next important thing to do is to de-orphan the article. That will increase the chances of people seeing it. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:22, 4 April 2015 (UTC)