Talk:Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.

No conclusion in the article
I am assuming that this case went to the U.S. Supreme Court because Octane Fitness was found in a district court to have not infringed any copyright brought by ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.?

However after the district court told Octane it could not get back the money it had already spent on retaining attorneys in this case, they appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court which took the decision that judges do have the discretion to make the loser pay in patent troll cases.

Hence my point, what was the conclusion to this judgement? Did Octane ever get a cent from ICON for trying to scare them into paying a "licence fee" for equipment that was not copyrighted?

This article currently does not state that.81.129.201.106 (talk) 14:24, 21 August 2014 (UTC)