Talk:Octet (Bruch)

External links inline
As already explained, these inline links do not meet the criteria of ELOFFICIAL nor the example set by ELLIST. Additionally, as per ELBURDEN disputed external links are excluded by default unless and until there is consensus to include them. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ELOFFICIAL doesn't apply here, as they are not official links. The links are accessible, useful, tasteful, informative, factual, functioning and likely to remain functional, as specified in the guideline. They are also not copyright violations. No criterion in ELNO directly applies here. Regarding ELBURDEN, the links have been here since the start of the article, and several editors have edited it since then without objection to the links. Thus an implicit consensus can be assumed. intforce (talk) 12:42, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * You quoted specifically a portion of EL that references ELOFFICIAL, although you are correct that it doesn't apply here. This is why these links, if they are to be included, should be in the appropriate section for external links rather than within the article body. And since disagreement has been voiced, implicit consensus cannot be assumed. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:38, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The Recordings section is not a body section, but part of the appendix, similar to MOS:BIB. intforce (talk) 11:06, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:ELPOINTS indicates that external links should be in an external links section, not some other section. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:40, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * You argue with pedantry. If EL specified that external links should be included in an external links section only, it would say so specifically. But then again, it is only a content guideline, and we are allowed to apply some common sense here. If you really think that readers are better off when the links are removed, take it to WP:ELN. I have articles to write. intforce (talk) 13:47, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Nothing you've said here leads me to believe "common sense" would support including these inline. And as I've said, the burden here is for inclusion, not exclusion. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:42, 24 March 2021 (UTC)