Talk:October (2018 film)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MrClog (talk · contribs) 11:24, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Failed "good article" nomination
Upon its review on May 16, 2019, this good article nomination was quick-failed because it:


 * contains cleanup banners including, but not limited to, cleanup, POV, unreferenced, etc, or large numbers of citation needed, clarify, or similar inline tags

thus making it ineligible for good article consideration. Because I found the "Plot" section to be a copyright violation, I tagged it as such and thus this nomination is a quickfail. It will likely need a whole new plot section it wants to pass review.

This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far.— MrClog (talk) 11:40, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Can you please mention the website the plot has been copied from? Harsh Rathod  Poke me!  12:25, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * As mentioned in the copypaste template, this site. --MrClog (talk) 13:49, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey, not that it matters, as there is already a new plot, but the older plot was not copyright violation as the mentioned website has copy-pasted the plot section from Wikipedia. It has done it for all of the films - except maybe Kalank (as it wasn't released when the webpage was hosted and the plot section was not there?) They have even copied their "Quick Info" from the lead section of the article - and have forgotten to edit it! *facepalm* Thanks! Vivek Ray (talk) 13:03, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, you are right. The month notified us about their review, I was having examinations and didn't get involved so much. It appears like MrClog didn't do in-depth review.  Harsh Rathod  Poke me!  09:15, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what depth you expect. A major film festival's site uses certain text and I felt it was safe to assume someone copied from that site. Were you the one who wrote the Plot section? If so, I do not get why you have the time to ask from which site there was a copyvio but not the time to state "I didn't copy from anyone, please take a further look into it" - something I would have gladly done. --MrClog (talk) 11:14, 11 August 2019 (UTC)