Talk:October Rebellion/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * A few comments:
 * Avoid linking dates. (fixed)
 * Remember to state the country. For some reason, Americans almost always seem to forget this vital information. (fixed)
 * The further reading link is dead. (fixed)
 * commonscat should be in the "external links" section. (fixed)
 * Three of the external links are removed. WP:EL is very restrictive on non-official sites. External links should be used as little as possible, and ideally only official sites should be used.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * There is no need to state that references are in English; they are presumed this by default. Foreign-language sources should of course state the language. (fixed)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * After having performed a copyedit, the article now meets the GA criteria. Congratulations! Arsenikk (talk)  11:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * After having performed a copyedit, the article now meets the GA criteria. Congratulations! Arsenikk (talk)  11:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * After having performed a copyedit, the article now meets the GA criteria. Congratulations! Arsenikk (talk)  11:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)