Talk:October Tide

members
now can someone fix the members section. looks sloppy.99.230.65.158 (talk) 06:19, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

reformed
the interview done with anders was actually in 2009 but wasn't released until 2010 so that means the band reformed in 2009.99.230.65.158 (talk) 06:19, 26 March 2010 (UTC)<>/s>

discography
I think the setup is wrong because I believe it shouldn't be separate but all in chronological order and the labels don't need to be there, it is listed once you've entered the separate links towards the articles.October 010 (talk) 05:45, 11 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by October 010 (talk • contribs)
 * I've seen both ways done on various articles, and I don't see a good reason to change it from the current format here. If you have a policy/WikiProject-based reason to change it, please explain and provide a link. As for the labels, I agree, they show up in the individual album articles. My guess is that those were added prior to the album articles being created. They can be removed. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 09:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)