Talk:Odd Project

Please stop deleting demos from the page
Various people have been deleting these from the page, potentially because they are literally named after the month/year they came out and did not have an official name. There is absolutely no reason for these not be included especially because:

a) they are an important part of the progression of the sound leading up to their first album b) it was an important factor of them even getting signed - in the first line, we even say "has recorded a few demos which resulted in a multi-album deal with Indianola Records." specifically. c) They are literally part of the bands discography, in which instance is that not relevant to this article

I absolutely understand not having specific pages for them, they would just be stubs with timetracks. If the issue is the naming of the demos, that is what they were listed on as their official site as. Demos are often untitled or just named demo, see Saetia, Dropdead, Untitled Deafheaven demo EP. If these are relevant to be on a wikipedia article, the three demos of Odd Project are as well

The source for October/July demos is an archive of their old website. It suffers from the ugly web trend of frames, so no direct link that shows the entire page, but clicking discography will show it. I confirm that April 2002 does indeed exist, and they disowned the demo because they did not like it. The web archive does not have the odd project page from before because in 2002, oddproject.com was an unrelated group from Oregon. It is still relevant, and should be included however. 2600:1700:2C79:20:1A3:886E:FBE8:3D0E (talk) 05:42, 17 June 2020 (UTC)