Talk:Off-modern

This article has essentially only one source: Notes 1, 2, 4, and 5 all lead to articles by Boym herself, (4 requires a further search to turn up the article in question) while 3 is broken. All three items in the Bibliography are by Boym. The word itself is a neologism that appears to be used only by Boym. This raises questions about the article's neutrality and objectivity as well as its general notability. It should probably be merged into the article on Boym.