Talk:Official Bulletin of the Principality of Andorra

Traducció
Poso la meva resposta aquí també, no m'agrada l'interfície que tenen allà a Mediawiki...
 * aqui també? on és el original? no puc trobar. wouldn't it be better to stick to english on an english talk page? --Lib2know (talk) 12:46, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The original is here. Vrac (talk) 13:19, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * thank you, now i understand ...--Lib2know (talk) 13:54, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

✅ (o Fet!) però et recomano posar-li fonts fiables i independents a l'article, així com és no crec que compleixi amb els requisits de WP:NOTABILITY... Vrac (talk) 02:42, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * When clicking to the greyish "English" link i was asked (automatically) for an translation and tried it even if sources where missing in the original languages. At least there is the link to the official website. The bulletin itself is used as a source for articles on Wikipedia. I agree the details need citation, probably from the BOPA-website itself. It might be possible to link some newspaper articles (BOPA is often mentioned in the headlines) that stresses the importance of the Bulletin inside the country.
 * WP:NOTABILITY seems to be given for several reasons: it is the official bulletin of a country, the article already exists in two languages; it deserves a separate article, cause there are so many different authorities publish at the bulletin: government, parishes, municipalities, courts of justice, public corporations and more.--Lib2know (talk) 12:46, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not saying it isn't notable, I'm saying that notability hasn't been established in the article. Notability is established in Wikipedia by what independent, reliable sources say about a topic.  Surely there are discussions of this publication in secondary sources that could be added as references to the article, right now it only has WP:PRIMARY sources. You're welcome for the proofreading... :) Vrac (talk) 13:19, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, i added sources, but as you say primary. On elperiodic.ad or diariandorra.ad there are dozens of articles mentioning BOPA as their source. An artcile about BOPA itself was hard to find. I will add as soon i find one.--Lib2know (talk) 13:54, 7 August 2015 (UTC)