Talk:Official hijackers of the 2001 attacks

So, waiting for the afd...--Striver 19:55, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

No AfD but the title needs renaming. Only half of those discussed in here are hijackers, and you need to be more specific than "2001 attacks". that and the typo. --Mmx1 20:07, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I would suggest "Hijackers of the September 11, 2001 attacks" to follow the format of Survivors of the September 11, 2001 attacks; don't need the term "official" since some on the list, frankly, aren't. --mtz206 20:17, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * And the "People claimed to be responsible" should be removed, since they aren't hijackers, official or suspected. --mtz206 20:19, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, there's already a Organizers of the September 11, 2001 attacks. This probably belongs there. --Mmx1 20:21, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * You're right. That article already lists the hijackers, just could use the suspected 20th or wrongly accused sections merged. --mtz206 20:23, 30 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Two points. First, because of the typo, this shouldn't be a redirect. Second. I thought about separating "organizers" from "hijackers", but there's really no point. This was a much more complex operation than walking on a plane and announcing you have a bomb, and "organizers" is a better description of their role than merely the most visible step of it. --Mmx1 20:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree with the above points that the "People claimed to be responsible" are beyond the scope of this article and are discussed in Organizers of the September 11, 2001 attacks. I also agree that the article should be kept, but renamed to Hijackers of the September 11, 2001 attacks - consistent with how other articles are named. -Aude ( talk | contribs ) 20:49, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Now that I've looked through the Organizers of the September 11, 2001 attacks article, I think an article on the hijackers is redundant and not needed. -Aude ( talk | contribs ) 21:02, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

I was bold and merged the article to the "organizers" article. Revert me if you dissagre. Peace. --Striver 11:13, 2 April 2006 (UTC)