Talk:Offshore wind port

US wind ports
In response to this edit summary: ''While it's probably positive that the US has "woken up" to offshore wind, it doesn't seem appropriate for this article to become a CFORK of the Offshore wind power in the United States article. Could/should this "list of ports" not be covered there? Other than as an exampled of RECENTISM, why are planned/proposed US port activities listed above ACTUAL port activities elsewhere? Where there have been ORE-servicing ports for years/decades?''

Djflem (talk) 15:03, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * The top-hat about "world wide' is inappropriate, since the sub-header is clear: US wind ports.
 * Which ACTUAL port activities is it listed above?
 * The lack of other ports listed, other than in a ==see also==, do not preclude a US list. Any editor is welcome and encouraged to create and add one.


 * Hi. Fair enough. In terms of an embedded list of:
 * European ORE ports, and while WindEurope's latest report includes 20+ current or potential such ports, I've included a list of the 6 largest. As these are discussed as a group in several sources.
 * US ORE ports (mostly planned/proposed), while I'm unsure of the proposed inclusion criteria (and hopefully it isn't open-ended), I have removed those entries that weren't supported by an inline ref. Ideally, if at all possible, our list would be discussed/covered as a group elsewhere. As above.
 * Asia/Pacific ports, and while I am less familiar, it seems likely that there should be at least some mention of the Port of Akita and a few others.
 * Cheers. Guliolopez (talk) 15:45, 28 February 2023 (UTC)