Talk:Ogdoad (Egyptian)

Needs Edit
Where it discussed the flags and axes, the sentence structure seems broken and as if it needs editing. Very sloppy appearance because the symbols are added by text in quotation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Armorbeast (talk • contribs) 07:21, 7 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks. The whole sentence was an outdated interpretation anyway, so I simply excised it. A. Parrot (talk) 17:43, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

The Ogdoad as a formula and hieroglyphic explanation for reproduction
I wanted to discuss the proposal for the following explanation for Thoth's explanation of the Ogdoad:

I do expect it to be somewhat "controversial" indeed, though: It is a formula for how two people can breed, even in the situation where no physical sex is involved. It does allow for both our traditional biological explanations, but in fact, I believe it focuses almost entirely on the "spiritual" means of reproducing. Yes. However, in this case it provides with it a far more scientific, logical, even computational means of proving itself. I expect that if we are all patient with each other, then Wikipedia can provide a good place to discuss the issue. I need to find a good place to present this work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:6430:4EC0:F147:7DF6:AC9:576F (talk) 23:07, 8 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Well, I'm afraid that place isn't here. Please see "Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought", a subsection of the Wikipedia policy page on What Wikipedia is not. A. Parrot (talk) 23:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)