Talk:Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. Dayton Christian Schools, Inc.

Oral arguments and Biblical chain of command
The oral arguments by the Ohio civil rights commission claimed that even if there was a binding arbitration clause, that the civil rights commission would still have jurisdiction (see the end of the oral argument).

I found the "biblical chain of command" that was described in the court documents to be different enough from the ones that I've heard of (they're usually based on Ephesians 5:22-33 and generally Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything. and most husbands seem forget the rest of the passage), that I had a hard time getting my head around what the school was trying to articulate. Perhaps someone else could clean that up a little? Tangurena (talk) 00:59, 16 April 2009 (UTC)