Talk:Okehampton Castle/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 21:13, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

I'll start this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:13, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Cheers! Will sort these tomorrow. Hchc2009 (talk) 20:56, 7 January 2013 (UTC)


 * intensively fallow deer??
 * Fixed. Hchc2009 (talk) 20:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Watch hyphens between page ranges rather than ndashes.
 * Should be fixed. Hchc2009 (talk) 20:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * There's an extraneous curly bracket in note 58
 * Fixed. Hchc2009 (talk) 20:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * You really might want to consider building some navboxes, organizing them by area and by type. But that's a whole different kettle of fish than this review.
 * Yeah - I've been trying to work out a good way to structure them. May raise at MilHist... Hchc2009 (talk) 20:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * What's the copyright status of the Widgery painting in the UK? If it's problematic, can you substitute some of the paintings mentioned in the article?
 * Good under the 70 yr rule and the file's been updated. I can't find a copy of the other paintings that's not covered by copyright in the UK (our rules being rather strict), although there'd be no problem in terms of US law. Hchc2009 (talk) 20:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Other pictures are good--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)