Talk:Old Charges (Freemasonry)

Duplicate coverage?
, this article appears to have a significant overlap with Masonic manuscripts. I was going to tag for a merge and redirect but I am not sure of the extent to which any content (or references) in this new article adds significantly to that of the other article. Could you review this please? AllyD (talk) 10:47, 3 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello @AllyD, my original intent was to create a full and complete article dedicated to the old charges, since the section on old charges within the manuscripts page is rather short compared to the amount of material that could be expanded upon.
 * Unfortunately I haven't had the time to dedicate to this article recently, but I should soon be able to continue the work and make this a full-fledged article, which would make it too lengthy to fit as a section of another page and deserves a dedicated page befitting its depth and significance, in my humble estimation. HyperSite (talk) 08:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Hi, Is there no images that could go in, brighten it. Its is a great article.

 scope_creep Talk  12:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC)