Talk:Olivia de Havilland/GA1

GA review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 16:46, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

I will review this tomorrow, definitely now;-)♦ Dr. Blofeld  19:35, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Reading now.♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Lede
 * ✅ " and psychological dramas playing unglamorous roles in such films as" Try "and unglamorous roles in psychological dramas such as"
 * ✅ " and television feature films, such as Anastasia: The Mystery of Anna for which she received a Primetime Emmy Award." -comma in the wrong place, move it to after Anna.


 * Early films
 * ✅ "Los Feliz section " -link?
 * ✅ "The film was released in February 1938,[81" -move this up to where you mention "The film, which marks her first appearance in three-strip Technicolor".


 * War years
 * ✅ "While the comedy is light, it is also intelligent, " -in who's opinion?


 * Personal life
 * ✅ "Stewart in fact proposed" -"in fact" not needed.
 * ✅ Link "Paris Match"?
 * Already linked in the lead and in the article above.


 * ✅ " Bois de Boulogne park in the Rive Droite section" -did you link these?
 * Already linked in the lead and in the article above.

Excellent job, very comprehensive. Perhaps a little too detailed in places but that can be addressed if needs be at PR stage. Certainly looks well researched enough to be a future FAC. Good job!♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you,, for reviewing this article. I appreciate your time very much. Sincerely, Bede735 (talk) 16:41, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Excellent job!♦  Dr. Blofeld  16:57, 9 May 2016 (UTC)