Talk:Ollanta Humala/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.


 * The most serious issue I see with this article is that its focus is largely on the 2006 Presidential elections, rather than being a biography of Humala. There's nothing about his career since 2006, for instance, other than a vague reference in the lead that he's in some way still important.


 * Lead
 * "After his defeat, Humala has remained as an important figure within Peruvian politics." Important in what way? This article seems to stop at 2006.


 * Military career.
 * The second paragraph and the last half of the first need to be cited.


 * 2000 uprising
 * The first and third paragraphs need to be cited.


 * The citation at the end of the second paragraph does not support all of the material in that paragraph. For instance, there's no mention of the 300 men reportedly on their way to support Humala.


 * "... the Peruvian populace with the influential left-of-center newspaper La República calling him 'valiant and decisive, unlike most in Peru. All direct quotations need to be attributed to their source.


 * 2006 presidential campaign
 * "There were some accusations that he incurred in torture ...". Should this be "engaged in torture"?


 * "On March 17, 2006 Humala's campaign came under some controversy ...". Non-idiomatic, needs to be rewritten.


 * The fifth paragraph is uncited.


 * The seventh paragraph contains another unattributed quotation.


 * Ideology
 * The first two paragraphs are uncited.


 * References
 * There are at least 8 dead links.

--Malleus Fatuorum 15:24, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

As these issues remain outstanding, this article has now been delisted. --Malleus Fatuorum 15:49, 30 October 2009 (UTC)