Talk:Olympic sports/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

The article's lead, as tagged, is not written in summary style. It does not accurately summarise the article. Parts of the article appear to contradict other parts. For example "Recognized international federations" does not list the recognised federations. It is also unclear why this is not in "Olympic sports definitions". --LauraHale (talk) 12:44, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Well-written:

Much of the article is completely uncited. This is the primary reason for nominating it for GAR. The article needs to be fully cited again to be a GA. --LauraHale (talk) 12:44, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Factually accurate and verifiable:

Appears mostly broad but organisation is a problem that makes this a bit hard to judge. --LauraHale (talk) 12:44, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Broad in its coverage

Appears to be mostly neutral. --LauraHale (talk) 12:44, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Neutral

Closing
As no changes have been made to the article in six days and no one has indicated they want to do the work to maintain GAN status, I will be closing this and delisting. --LauraHale (talk) 11:59, 2 July 2012 (UTC)